<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The Next Five Big NASA Failures</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericgu/archive/2004/11/17/259305.aspx</link><description>Jeffrey F. Bell writes in SpaceDaily : One of the most annoying things about NASA is that its dysfunctional management wastes a huge amount of effort on projects long after they are clearly doomed. You know, I can't agree with him more. I think the space</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The Next Five Big NASA Failures</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericgu/archive/2004/11/17/259305.aspx#265853</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:265853</guid><dc:creator>Shannon J Hager</dc:creator><description>There is a simple answer for the ISS problem but because of the beaurocracy and because of the uproar it would cause (&amp;quot;that's government exploitation!&amp;quot;), it won't happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But if they had 2 or 3 unpaid positions for those &amp;quot;keep it running&amp;quot; jobs, the scientists could do their work.  There would be a few things to tackle before it could happen and a few people in line for the job would balk at the &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; part, but I am 100% certain qualified applicants would take the job for the greater good of us all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=265853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>