<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Attention passengers: Flight 0703 is also known as Flight 451</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx</link><description>I hate octal. Octal causes bugs. I hate bugs, particularly stupid "gotcha" bugs.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Pop Quiz</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx#200971</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:200971</guid><dc:creator>Fabulous Adventures In Coding</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=200971" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Attention passengers: Flight 0703 is also known as Flight 451</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx#53282</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2003 01:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53282</guid><dc:creator>Eric Lippert</dc:creator><description>Correct -- JScript .NET does not participate in the old, 20th century unmanaged Windows Script interfaces.  Rather, it uses the IVSA, aka &amp;quot;Script for the .NET Framework&amp;quot; interfaces.  

One of the shortcomings of the old Windows Script interfaces was that there was no way to surface warnings, only errors.  IVSA provides a more fully-fledged compiler hosting mechanism.

JScript .NET has some super-cool error recovery mechanisms for IVSA scenarios -- I might blog about them later, or convince Peter to.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53282" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Attention passengers: Flight 0703 is also known as Flight 451</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx#53281</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53281</guid><dc:creator>Kim Gräsman</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;This is why I added code to JScript .NET so that any use of an integer decimal or octal literal that begins with zero yields a compiler warning&amp;quot;

Out of curiosity: How does the warning manifest itself? A callback to the script host? Or is JScript.NET not part of the whole Active Scripting family?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53281" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Attention passengers: Flight 0703 is also known as Flight 451</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx#53280</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53280</guid><dc:creator>Eric Lippert</dc:creator><description>Well, sure, but an ASP page could also generate a JScript block full of unterminated strings, and we catch those at compile time.  &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53280" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Attention passengers: Flight 0703 is also known as Flight 451</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2003/10/23/53278.aspx#53279</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53279</guid><dc:creator>Jack Shainsky</dc:creator><description>Actually, not always the problem can be caught at compile time. If server generates pages with JS dynamically, the number containing 8 or 9 can appear in actual script once in a while. So the decision to correct the problem on the fly is not so bad as it seems.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53279" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>