<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/florinlazar/archive/2007/03/07/allowing-transactions-into-your-component-do-you-really-want-that.aspx</link><description>Supporting transactions is part of your component contract. If you shipped a component yesterday that exposed MyComp.DoWork to the public, and today you want to add transactional support to your component, you shouldn't use the same method MyComp.DoWork</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/florinlazar/archive/2007/03/07/allowing-transactions-into-your-component-do-you-really-want-that.aspx#7061993</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:09:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7061993</guid><dc:creator>sriramsrivatsan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Florian. Figured that out. &amp;nbsp;Had to do a minor design change due to the incorrect understanding that I had.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7061993" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/florinlazar/archive/2007/03/07/allowing-transactions-into-your-component-do-you-really-want-that.aspx#7059337</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:59:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7059337</guid><dc:creator>florinlazar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;to: sriramsrivatsan &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nested transactions are not supported by MSDTC or by System.Transactions. Most of the commercial resource managers (DBMS) don't support them either.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7059337" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/florinlazar/archive/2007/03/07/allowing-transactions-into-your-component-do-you-really-want-that.aspx#7042993</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:14:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7042993</guid><dc:creator>sriramsrivatsan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. I was under the impression that the MSDTCs durable transactions that are nested in nature and having a nested transactionscope were one and the same thing. Is this understanding inaccurate? &amp;nbsp;Am guessing so since the code that I have written doesnt work. &amp;nbsp;Can you point out any link that talks about how to implement nested transactions (not transactionscope) using System.Transactions? &amp;nbsp;Thanks a lot. Your blogs have thrown so much more light on the concepts behind the great job you guys have done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7042993" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/florinlazar/archive/2007/03/07/allowing-transactions-into-your-component-do-you-really-want-that.aspx#6550401</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:24:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6550401</guid><dc:creator>Allowing Transactions into Your Component: "Do you really want that?"</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://feeds.maxblog.eu/item_705986.html"&gt;http://feeds.maxblog.eu/item_705986.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6550401" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>