<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sai Sireesh - Regulatory Vision 2020 - Top 10 list </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/grc/archive/2010/06/08/sai-sireesh-regulatory-vision-2020-top-10-list.aspx</link><description>I am a keen follower of the Australian regulator APRA that in my mind certainly ranks amongst the thought leaders in regulatory thinking. APRA has been at the forefront of many new regulatory concepts and pro-active adoption. Its current focus is on 3</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Sai Sireesh - Regulatory Vision 2020 - Top 10 list </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/grc/archive/2010/06/08/sai-sireesh-regulatory-vision-2020-top-10-list.aspx#10022415</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:41:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10022415</guid><dc:creator>David Cox</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The Twin Peaks approach definitely gets good markets, but the Australian and Dutch capital markets are pretty small whereas the U.S. and European markets are much more globalized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do national regulators cope with global markets several times bigger than their own countries?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10022415" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>