http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspxRegularly, in microsoft.public.biztalk newsgroups, folks would like to archive messages as they are received by BizTalk, before any further processing. There are numerous ways to achieve this and the most obvious ones (non exhaustive list): When the orchestrationen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#9363762Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:35:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9363762receive port question | keyongtech<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/323062-receive-port-question">http://www.keyongtech.com/323062-receive-port-question</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9363762" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#8364335Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:50:51 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8364335DBMessageLogger - A Streaming Message Logger Pipeline component &laquo; Monish Nagisetty&#8217;s Space<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://monishnagisetty.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/dbmessagelogger-a-streaming-message-logger-pipeline-component/">http://monishnagisetty.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/dbmessagelogger-a-streaming-message-logger-pipeline-component/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8364335" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#231024Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:54:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:231024Gilles' WebLog<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=231024" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#231023Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:50:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:231023Gilles' WebLog<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=231023" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#191038Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:13:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:191038JorisGilles this is great. Just what I was looking for for a long time. Now I am able to archive messages before they enter my orchestration. (which in my opinion is the wrong place for an achive action!)<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=191038" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#181498Tue, 13 Jul 2004 06:31:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:181498Ananth KrishnaGilles; my customers dont want me touching the received document/message in the pipeline. I suggested this to them but they would have none of it.. <br> <br>anyways my wish for the next version of the product is that the received side (port or location preferably at the port level) or send as well contains a check box for archive and a facility to provide archive..so even before it goes to the pipline; it gets archived. <br> <br>another reason for not writing pipeline components; customers dont want to write code....man i have some obstinate clients :) <br> <br>anyways..thanks for the code <br> <br>cheers~ <br>ananth <br><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181498" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/gzunino/archive/2004/07/12/181337.aspx#181364Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:58:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:181364Jeff LynchGilles you are the man! This example pipeline component is exactly what most of us who don't have extensive &quot;stream&quot; programming experience are looking for. A good, solid example. <br> <br>Thanks!<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=181364" width="1" height="1">