<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx</link><description>Yes, you too can DateLance.com! Whew, good thing I am not "down with the 'big family thing'". You can read commentary from Monsterblog here . My personal take: 
 1) If it's viral advertising, I think hawking your employee's romantic life is bit gross</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#446114</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:35:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:446114</guid><dc:creator>HeatherLeigh</dc:creator><description>One thing though...I assume the point of the campaign (if it's indeed a recruiting campaign, which I belive it is) is to get people hired, not just drive traffic to the site. So traffic from people that are grossed out by the site isn't really going to help them. It's kind of like what I was talking about with target audience. Eyeballs are good, the right eyeballs are best.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=446114" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#446050</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:35:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:446050</guid><dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator><description>From my perspective this campaign has almost nothing to do with Dating Lance. They chose something specifically that would be controversial to drive traffic, get recruitment, and get everyone to see the imagery. How many thousands of people have now seen the LogoWorks logo and have had it permanently branded into their brain?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Being single myself, I find this route of advertising definately something I wouldn't be willing to do. There are specifically some things that should not be for sale and honestly my dating life should not be used for corporate goodness. In the same regard to some of the reality TV shows, I would think that almost any relationship started for such reasons would surely have increased chances of failing. (Maybe it's the hopeless romantic in me?)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=446050" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445985</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:01:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445985</guid><dc:creator>Peter Clayton</dc:creator><description>Hi Heather,&lt;br&gt;IMHO, here's an example of a GREAT online marketing campaign... funny, relevant - sure to create a buzz&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.landed.fm/shows/gautam.html"&gt;http://www.landed.fm/shows/gautam.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445985" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445816</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 01:50:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445816</guid><dc:creator>HeatherLeigh</dc:creator><description>Ingenious in getting eyeballs. Loaded with HR violations! I'm 99% sure it's fake too but 1) still gross and 2) containing lots of stuff that could get them in trouble. So, overall, I'm not buying into the conclusion that they are &amp;quot;smart&amp;quot; for doing this. &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445736</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:56:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445736</guid><dc:creator>Doug Kentner</dc:creator><description>I think the nail in the coffin for this site being some miguided recruiting attempt comes from the FAQ page:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;LogoWorks is a fun place. We'll do just about anything to make our employees truly happy!&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally I think everyone is taking the campaign a little too seriously. (for example I think the disputed quotes are most likely false, and constructed specifically for this site) As in patBlue's case i'm local to the area in question so I probably have somewhat of a unique understanding of the area's dynamics. I don't agree in the least with launching a recruiting campaign of this type without express permission of the person being spotlighted. Granted this campaign was probably not engineered very well,  or perhaps even thought through to logical conclusion (or perhaps it was), it wouldn't be the first time that a company pushed out commercials or marketing materials of a questionable nature (something released by microsoft some time back involving lingere and Microsoft Office) comes to mind. So perhaps it's best to take the advertising for what it is, a gimick. And if everyone pays a bunch of attention to it, then it's done exactly what it was designed to do.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445736" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445284</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:18:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445284</guid><dc:creator>Chris Woodruff</dc:creator><description>Is it the first of April because I am smelling a pile of dung!!!  That has got to be the cheapest way to get a million eyeballs into your company.  Despicable but ingenious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now that would have been a great episode of The Apprentice... teams go an try to make a marketing plan out of something totally unrelated to the company and then execute it!!  I would have enjoyed that episode myself. :)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445284" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445188</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:24:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445188</guid><dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator><description>RE the CEO's comments: &amp;quot;I knew the first time I met with Lance that I wanted to hire him, but that he'd be the only person on our marketing team without a significant other.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wow. Sounds like someone needs a little retraining from HR about even &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;discussing&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; a candidate's marital status. Or significant other status.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But then again, I'm with AdRants, it's a fake.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445188" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445172</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:14:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445172</guid><dc:creator>Lourdes</dc:creator><description>Ewwww.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, that pretty much sums it up - Ewww. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a single Marketing Director type with no &amp;quot;significant other&amp;quot;, I'm rendered vaguely nauseous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445172" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445153</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:48:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445153</guid><dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator><description>Oh, honestly, everything in advertising is about attention.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They want attention, they do something funky.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They got your attention, you even drew more attention to it by posting it in your blog: they won.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445153" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Mortification potential: high</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/heatherleigh/archive/2005/07/29/445050.aspx#445132</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:14:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445132</guid><dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator><description>I'm surprised it's taken this long for the reality mentality to hit the web, especially given the success of even the worst TV series. I believe this type of &amp;quot;is it real or advertising&amp;quot; will grow and will create  more blurry lines between reality and advertising.  If there can be &amp;quot;Marry My Dad&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Marry a Millionaire&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Marry a Stranger&amp;quot;, etc, etc. then the extension will be a flurry of &amp;quot;Date Me&amp;quot; websites.  The difference here is that a company has involved itself fully in the process and &amp;quot;unbeknownst&amp;quot; to Lance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The world is changing and the mores of yesteryear have been obliterated.  It just means I have to take more time to read the fine print.  The question is going to be whether this results in &amp;quot;15 minutes of fame&amp;quot; for this company or translates into a &amp;quot;black hole&amp;quot; that they won't crawl out of.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=445132" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>