<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>C++/CLI keywords: Under the hood</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hsutter/archive/2003/11/23/53519.aspx</link><description>C++/CLI specifies several keywords as extensions to ISO C++. The way they are handled
 falls into five major categories, where only the first impacts the meaning of existing
 ISO C++ programs. 
 
 
 1. Outright reserved words 
 
 
 As of this writing</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> Herb Sutter s Blog C CLI keywords Under the hood | Quick Diets</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hsutter/archive/2003/11/23/53519.aspx#9722507</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:08:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9722507</guid><dc:creator> Herb Sutter s Blog C CLI keywords Under the hood | Quick Diets</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=12620"&gt;http://quickdietsite.info/story.php?id=12620&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9722507" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: C++/CLI keywords: Under the hood</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hsutter/archive/2003/11/23/53519.aspx#53521</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53521</guid><dc:creator>kurakuraninja</dc:creator><description>Why don't you guys do something useful like add C99 support or GCC extensions instead of this stuff? Or hell, even numeric literals with the 0b/0B prefix would be a decent start.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53521" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: C++/CLI keywords: Under the hood</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hsutter/archive/2003/11/23/53519.aspx#53520</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:53520</guid><dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator><description>I was all set to say, &amp;quot;#define interface struct is not at all obscure - it's in the VC++ header files.&amp;quot;  So, I guess the next version of the compiler will have new header files defining interface IDispatch, etc?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=53520" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>