<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx</link><description>At Velocity , we showed Internet Explorer 9 as the first browser to support the W3C Navigation Timing proposal to provide performance information to developers at runtime. This interface is aimed at helping developers measure and understand the performance</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10089732</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:45:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10089732</guid><dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Speaking of standards -- why does IE9 have a NEW property on the window object that returns NULL?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;window.ActiveXObject&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff974676%28v=VS.85%29.aspx"&gt;msdn.microsoft.com/.../ff974676%28v=VS.85%29.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the kind of crap that got Microsoft in trouble in the first place... even more awesome is the notes that say if we as developers put stuff there in the past, to stop it... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arghhh!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10089732" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10089200</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:02:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10089200</guid><dc:creator>raw</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The iframe element should follow the css border:none and overflow:hidden to hide the border and scrollbar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;frameborder and scrolling are no longer allowed in the HTML 5 spec.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10089200" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10089053</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:41:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10089053</guid><dc:creator>Hawcreek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Uhm&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It also lacks a spell checker, which is your case would be a non starter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10089053" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10089025</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:58:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10089025</guid><dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This looks great guys! Glad we don&amp;#39;t have to use crazy hacks to get these metrics!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A couple of questions/enhancements:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- support SSLStart and End to figure out SSL Handshake time. Currently I am assuming it goes into the Connect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- what would be the wait time? So once connection established (ConnectEnd) the request is Sent, and than the client waits for the server. Is it :responseStart - requestStart - the concern here is there is no RequestEnd (usually request is super fast, 1 packet, but there are some cases where it is slow say an ASP.net page with a vert large ViewState?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tony&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10089025" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10089018</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:50:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10089018</guid><dc:creator>Stefan van Zanden</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds cool, something we need in our completly Ajax based webapplications is a good way to find Memory leaks, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is finding stuff like that something that will be added in IE9?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example I would really want to know if a HTML DOM Element couldn&amp;#39;t be cleaned up by the garbage collector &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;because there is still an eventhandler attached to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10089018" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10088867</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:32:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10088867</guid><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Keep up the good work :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10088867" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10088779</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:05:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10088779</guid><dc:creator>uhm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hmm.... that printscreen remains me of crappy IE9 fonts and reason why i will not use it..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10088779" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Web Page Performance in a Standards Compliant and Interoperable way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2010/11/09/web-page-performance-in-a-standards-compliant-and-interoperable-way.aspx#10088758</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:12:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10088758</guid><dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite cool indeed! It certainly shows that IE9 is now a capable modern web browser unlike all previous versions of IE. &amp;nbsp;Congratulations on such speedy, trackable results!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing though. &amp;nbsp;Are these times subject to delays due to IE Addons? e.g. If I have the &amp;quot;WhackySlow Bar BHO&amp;quot; installed am I going to see these numbers grow wildly without any explanation or ability to debug?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Larry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10088758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>