Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

mary — Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:06:00 GMT

I do not understand why?.

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

mary — Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:04:43 GMT

none

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

Jessica — Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:04:22 GMT

@Dennis - your behavior is atrocious - please stay off this blog unless you can control your childish behavior

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

Dennis — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:51:41 GMT

@PhistucK, bitching about irrelevant stuff on open blog is not civilized either. You started this mess.. so don't be an oversensitive prickk

Now, you think "you win"?

Installing Mesh and keep it running as compared to preinstalled RDC.

You just need to remember your computer name or URL.

RDC connection always works faster, compared to Mesh or TeamViewer.

Remembering the name (or address) of your computer vs. all the trouble.. your think its pretty trivial.. just to prove your point.

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

PhistucK — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:07:21 GMT

@Dennis -

Please, keep it civilized. I have not attacked you in any way.

I meant that the Remote Desktop Connection software (mstsc.exe) is part of Windows.

Yeah, right - simple is the word for what you just described. IP addresses... everyone knows what they are. Dynamic DNS... simply common knowledge. And that check box that enables Remote Desktop/Assistance in System Properties - everyone ticks it.

As opposed to logging into (...) Mesh, installing whatever and clicking on a button. Simpler for the normal user, less technical and more discover-able, I would say.

(I tried Live Mesh, not Windows Live Mesh.)

I think this discussion is over (not because I think I "won" or anything. I do not think that way, it is just completely off topic here).

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

Dennis — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:53:24 GMT

@PhistucK,

"Remote desktop is a Windows feature"

so it is not supposed to be present in cloud application. And what are you saying, RDC is not "simple"? You stupid trolling ***! its as simple as you can bet your ass. Just type your IP address or computer name and hit enter. If your IP address is shared, use dynamic DNS.

Plus SkyDrive has more advanced features, you can access your computer remotely via web and save *any* file in your Computer drives (including attached USBs and CDs/DVDs) to SD or download on remote computer.

"I have not tried Windows Live Mesh"

then what the *** you are whining about you clingy lil ***?

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

PhistucK — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:15:55 GMT

@Dennis -

I have read it when it was posted. Specifically that part, actually.

Remote Desktop is a Windows feature. It is not part of SkyDrive and it is not as simple as Live Mesh (I have not tried Windows Live Mesh) was to set up. The second offered alternative (LogMeIn) is not even a Microsoft product.

What was it about ignoring the read, you said?

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

Dennis — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 08:13:44 GMT

@PhistucK,

The aforementioned blog post IS about the feature set of Mesh vs the feature set of SkyDrive. There is a heading called "Remote desktop". Should you have read it, you won't be raising that point. But its very typical to ignore the read and jump in for the lame debate just to prove your point.

"Again, the point you and Tyrone were trying to make is irrelevant here"

No this is exactly the point. You aim is to cuss, step away and leave the impression as if all your claims are valid.

You know what else is typical? You 'think" or you are trying the reader to think that you aren't bashing, but the reality is opposite. Being smart and manipulative don't last forever.

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

PhistucK — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:46:29 GMT

@Dennis -

Live Mesh/Windows Live Mesh are announced to be superseded by SkyDrive, but SkyDrive does not provide the same functionality (Remote Desktop is not there, for example). Again, the point you and Tyrone were trying to make is irrelevant here.

The fact that Internet Explorer fails the least in these tests does not say a lot. Every browser vendor chooses its investments according to its interests.

I am not saying Internet Explorer, or Microsoft, are crap. I was not even bashing.

(Perhaps "Your points are pretty obsolete as it is." was a bad way to put it and it made you angry - "points" referred to the points you and Tyrone (together) were trying to make.)

re: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-077 – Critical

Dennis — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:04:50 GMT

@PhistucK,, nice try bashing against MSFT corporation again. Did they eat your lunch or what? Why you all bashers are using their products for decades and still whining like *lil britches*. Damm son!

Live Mesh is superseded by SkyDrive. You can read more about it blogs.windows.com/.../update-on-windows-live-mesh.aspx

Your lame arguments stinks as it is.

For JavaScript, lets try the real deal here: ECMA is the official body for JavaScript standards (en.wikipedia.org/.../Ecma_International). Here is their latest official test-bed http://test262.ecmascript.org/

Run it on your beloved browser and then IE10 and compare the results.

Honestly, if you have a little sense of justice.. its time to move on to your god Google/Mozilla/Apple blogs and start whining there.

And please don't come back here.

/kill-trolls