<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx</link><description>With the delivery of RC 1 of Windows Server 2003 &amp;amp; Windows x64 Client last month, we shipped not one but two browsers with the OS: a 32- and 64-bit version of IE6 for Windows Server 2003 SP1/x64. We had to make a choice with the 64-bit client as to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Another case for native 64-bit Delphi | keyongtech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#9361571</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:20:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9361571</guid><dc:creator>Another case for native 64-bit Delphi | keyongtech</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/4480279-another-case-for-native-64-a"&gt;http://www.keyongtech.com/4480279-another-case-for-native-64-a&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9361571" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Explorer 64 e 128 bit | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#9356523</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:25:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9356523</guid><dc:creator>Explorer 64 e 128 bit | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.it/1866489-explorer-64-e-128-bit"&gt;http://www.hilpers.it/1866489-explorer-64-e-128-bit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9356523" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>typing programs 64 bit</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#8635128</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:36:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8635128</guid><dc:creator>typing programs 64 bit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mckenna.finestmatingstories.com/typingprograms64bit.html"&gt;http://mckenna.finestmatingstories.com/typingprograms64bit.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8635128" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#366341</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:366341</guid><dc:creator>You all don't get it</dc:creator><description>*Macromedia&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=366341" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#366340</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 16:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:366340</guid><dc:creator>You all don't get it</dc:creator><description>ROTFLOL... do any of you use the Marcromedia Flash plugin?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=366340" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: 32 bit ActiveX not working in x64?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#359600</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:359600</guid><dc:creator>scramasax</dc:creator><description>Perfect  don't change that , this is actually an advantage of the 64 bit edition. I don't want activeX component on web site because they are dangerous. &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=359600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#359486</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:359486</guid><dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator><description>I wonder do you have examples of how a developer would provide the correct version of a control to an IE client. I presume we would be able to detect whether a client was 32bit or 64bit separately to the browser version (6.0 for example).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be great if these examples additionally showed the upgrade path for developers wanting to supply .net plugins with the Framework (which will hopefully sidestep the 64bit issue). &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=359486" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#354786</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:354786</guid><dc:creator>snowknight</dc:creator><description>Jim &amp;amp; Aankhen: Sorry, I miswrote.  Its been a few months since I worked on this script.  Whenever, I try to work on the variable, thats when it overflows.  Try this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;var testvar = 2147483648;&lt;br&gt;document.write(testvar + &amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;quot;);&lt;br&gt;testvar = ((testvar &amp;amp; 4278190080) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 24);&lt;br&gt;document.write(testvar);&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've already gotten this solved, but its more of a workaround than a fix.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=354786" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#353913</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:353913</guid><dc:creator>Aankhen</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;snowknight: it sounds like you're using a signed variable when you need an unsigned one?&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What technique do you know of to control data types in JavaScript?  I'd be quite interested...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aside from that, preliminary testing indicates that 2^31 should not overflow (i.e. simply assigning the raw value to a variable and using alert() to show it).&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=353913" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: The 64-bit browser in Windows x64</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2005/01/12/351808.aspx#353868</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 08:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:353868</guid><dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator><description>snowknight: it sounds like you're using a signed variable when you need an unsigned one?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=353868" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>