Internet Explorer is Hiring

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | work from home

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | work from home — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:46:24 GMT

PingBack from http://workfromhomecareer.info/story.php?id=14744

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Joint Pain Relief

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Joint Pain Relief — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:42:58 GMT

PingBack from http://jointpainreliefs.info/story.php?id=951

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Toe Nail Fungus

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Toe Nail Fungus — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:36:01 GMT

PingBack from http://toenailfungusite.info/story.php?id=3302

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Cellulite Creams

IEBlog Internet Explorer is Hiring | Cellulite Creams — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:03:48 GMT

PingBack from http://cellulitecreamsite.info/story.php?id=3396

Internet Explorer 7

JRB Technology — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:29:19 GMT

He said the new version will be built on the work they did in SP2, and other things. Gates mentioned they will go further to defend IE users from phishing and other deceptive software.

re: Internet Explorer is Hiring

Hmm — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:27:29 GMT

RE: This is downright rude....
"PS: who are you to be judging them.... what have you ever done to be special...?"

Well in answer to that I am a person who has purchased their product. That gives me the right to judge and rant if I may.
I'm also an "Open Source" Programmer who has contributed more lines of "free" code and documentation in one month than most"End Users" read in their e-mail in a year."Nuff Said"
* OFF TOPIC BELOW THIS LINE *

RE:Bob said

"I also teach an xhtml and css class. Even in its full glory, CSS is NOT fully supported across all platforms or browsers and is very, very hard to learn all the secrets because of the inconsistencies.

"Am I saying that it should be done away with? No. I am saying that many all but worship "web standards" (and again, these are NOT web standards - there needs to be given another TRULY reflective name) when the reality is that like any other programming language it is flawed and needs serious fixing."

IMHO:)I agree XHTML and CSS aren't the web standard.But what does "XHTML" have to do with accessibility standards anyway?(NOTHING)
XHTML is curently in a serious state of flux not to mention the next version will be totally incompatible with the current version.
That being said I ponder out of curiosity?(not intended to poke)while teaching XHTML, what are you teaching concerning the changes to the codebase that will be taking place and how it will effect useability ?
I hope you aren't telling them by chance that XHTML meets accessibility guidelines? Emphatically thats not the case.
It is however a fact that XHTML is "not" required to meet any known accessibility guideline. But since simple statements of fact seem to get whittled in newsgroups, best to read the Section 508 and WAI guidelines yourselves to eliminate any confusion.

Have a good day.

re: Internet Explorer is Hiring

Zach — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:30:52 GMT

>>> That said, the W3C sits there and thumbs its nose
>>> at M$ and IE and in many cases develops code which
>>> intentially breaks IE.
>Uh, no, the guys there try to think and
>create new standards, the fact that IE
>doesn't implement said standard is another
>problem and not the fault of W3C

I love people that do not even know of which they speak. The W3C does not sit around and try to think of new standards. Anybody can submit standards to them, if you are willing to buy the right to do so (yes, cold hard cash - and you to can submit standards).

The W3C board is a who's who of big business, and thats about it.

re: Internet Explorer is Hiring

FlorentG — Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:57:36 GMT

Hehehe ;)

re: Internet Explorer is Hiring

Chris Beach — Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:10:11 GMT

FlorentG: "In a few years, you'll have to write you site for FF, and cater with IE's problems and its 10% share"

Ah, at least you've got a sense of humour.

re: Internet Explorer is Hiring

FlorentG — Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:02:47 GMT

Chris Beach said :
> "In particular I find the W3C box model (vs the original MS box model) to be counter-intuitive."
For this one, I agree with you. Microsoft's box model is better... That's why
we have a box-sizing property in CSS3 which lets you choose which box model you
want, hehehe....

> "As a web developer, I'm fed up with having to cater for the various <10% share browsers."
Welcome to the real world, Chris : people want to be able to choose which browser they want... And remember that some people are not running the Windows
plateform, that HTML is a publishing language, which means it runs on several
devices...

> "I'm sick to death of militant 'standards evangelism.' If the standards were complete, coherent, unambigous, non-contradictory and useful, then I'd expect MS to implement them."
And I'm sick of person who think that there should be only one browser, one OS,
one Car, one Cola brand... Monopoly is not good. And standards are here to help
us to make website that run on everything... And I still want you to show us why
standards are so incoherent...

And don't worry, FireFox's market share is still rising... In a few years, you'll have to write you site for FF, and cater with IE's problems and its 10%
share ;)