<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx</link><description>As we’ve worked on the new Phishing Filter in IE7, we knew the key measure would be how effective it is in protecting customers. In addition to our internal tests, we wanted to find some external measure of our progress to date as well as pointing to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | internet marketing tools</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#9758175</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9758175</guid><dc:creator> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | internet marketing tools</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://einternetmarketingtools.info/story.php?id=7644"&gt;http://einternetmarketingtools.info/story.php?id=7644&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9758175" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | Green Tea Fat Burner</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#9717872</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:33:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9717872</guid><dc:creator> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | Green Tea Fat Burner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=3455"&gt;http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=3455&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9717872" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#9661745</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 03:36:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9661745</guid><dc:creator> IEBlog Anti Phishing Accuracy Study | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=ieblog-anti-phishing-accuracy-study"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=ieblog-anti-phishing-accuracy-study&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9661745" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Firefox Myths | Foxfire Facts</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#6776265</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:22:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6776265</guid><dc:creator>Firefox Myths | Foxfire Facts</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mozillafirefox3.net/firefox-myths/"&gt;http://mozillafirefox3.net/firefox-myths/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6776265" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Windows Security Blogs  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1876158</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:00:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1876158</guid><dc:creator>Windows Security Blogs  » Blog Archive   » Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://winblogs.security-feed.com/2006/09/28/anti-phishing-accuracy-study/"&gt;http://winblogs.security-feed.com/2006/09/28/anti-phishing-accuracy-study/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1876158" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Computer &amp;raquo; IE7 at RSA San Francisco</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1613468</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:30:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1613468</guid><dc:creator>Computer » IE7 at RSA San Francisco</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://computer.chardum.com/uncategorized/2007/02/06/ie7-at-rsa-san-francisco/"&gt;http://computer.chardum.com/uncategorized/2007/02/06/ie7-at-rsa-san-francisco/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1613468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>IE7 at RSA San Francisco</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1612966</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:10:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1612966</guid><dc:creator>IEBlog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Back in November, we announced our intention to bring Extended Validation SSL Certificates to IE7 . This&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1612966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>paul thurrot gets it wrong on firefox</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1481598</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:05:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1481598</guid><dc:creator>Asa Dotzler  - Firefox and more</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Thurrott, in his somewhat late review, takes a look at Firefox 2's new features. Unfortunately, and something I didn't expect from Paul, it's either the most intentionally misleading review of Firefox, or it's a completely unserious piece of writing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1481598" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>   Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study :: 
Newstack</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1233857</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:56:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1233857</guid><dc:creator>   Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study :: 
Newstack</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://accuracy.newstack.com/anti-phishing-accuracy-study-2/"&gt;http://accuracy.newstack.com/anti-phishing-accuracy-study-2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1233857" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pierres Service  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/09/28/774513.aspx#1166948</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:18:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1166948</guid><dc:creator>Pierres Service  » Blog Archive   » Anti-Phishing Accuracy Study</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://accuracy.pierresccservice.com/anti-phishing-accuracy-study/"&gt;http://accuracy.pierresccservice.com/anti-phishing-accuracy-study/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1166948" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>