IEInternals

A look at Internet Explorer from the inside out. @EricLaw left Microsoft in 2012, but was named an IE MVP in '13 & an IE userAgent (http://useragents.ie) in '14

Use IMG tags only for Images

Use IMG tags only for Images

  • Comments 8

First, a bit of background.

When web developers are optimizing the performance of their sites, often they try to use their homepage to pre-cache resources that will be used on later pages. They might do so by kicking off "pre-fetch" resource downloads after the content required by the homepage itself has downloaded. It turns out that some sites attempte to use IMG tags for pre-fetching purposes-- IMGs seem like an ideal choice because they are not limited to same-origin requests, and if you prefetch a stylesheet or JavaScript file, the target rules or script will not execute when loaded into the IMG tag.

Some especially cutting-edge sites have tried to “help” browsers’ Lookahead Downloaders by using hidden IMG tags at the very top of their response to reference resources that will be needed later in the same page. The idea is that, by doing so, the browser will get resource requests out on the wire earlier, such that when the browser’s parser reaches the SCRIPT or LINK tag that needs the resource, the request for that resource will already be well-underway. Of course, the whole point of the Lookahead is to get resource request out earlier, but the technique of using IMG tags at the very top ensures that those URLs are very early in the HTTP response, possibly long before the client receives the markup containing the SCRIPT or LINK tags.

Unfortunately, using IMG tags to prefetch JavaScript and Stylesheets can actually slow your page down.

I love a good mystery, so I was excited when a website owner emailed me a Fiddler capture that showed Internet Explorer was downloading a resource on a page twice, despite the fact that the second download kicked off after the first one ended, and the first download had a proper caching header that would allow the resource to be re-used. What was going on here?

Fortunately, the capture was made with the X-Download-Initiator header enabled, so I was able to see why each request was made. The first download of the script was kicked off when the Lookahead reached an IMG tag. The second was kicked off when the parser reached a SCRIPT tag with the same SRC value. The URLs were identical-- why was the second request sent?

A further look showed that the client had actually aborted the first request, which explains why the second request was needed. But why was the first request aborted?

When IE encounters an IMG tag, it creates an image object and assigns the download request to it. As data arrives from the image download, it’s fed into the browser's image decoders. The decoders will reject data as malformed if you feed them plaintext, which seems reasonable, since they can't possibly make use of such data. When the decoders reject the data as "Not possibly an image," the image object will abort its processing. As a part of that abort, if the download has not yet completed, it too is aborted.

Aborting a download can be very bad for performance. Firstly, the client won’t get the resource that it asked for—only the part of the resource downloaded before the abort will be cached, and even that portion is cached only if the response was served with an ETAG and a Content-Length. If those headers are present, the browser may be able to later download the remainder of the file using a HTTP Range request. Secondly, establishing TCP/IP connections (and possibly HTTPS handshaking on top of that) can be quite expensive, so throwing away perfectly good connections can measurably increase the load time of your page.

I built a MeddlerScript that demonstrates this problem quite clearly. After loading the .ms file, click the Compile and View button in Meddler. Your browser will open a HTML page that pulls in two JavaScript files, one using an IMG tag and one using the SCRIPT tag. The script pulled in using the SCRIPT tag immediately executes as expected, and the script downloaded by the IMG tag, as expected, does not run. If you then click the link to the second HTML page, you’ll see that the SCRIPT-fetched script is pulled from the cache and reused, but the IMG-fetched script is re-downloaded from the server. If you look at the Log tab in Meddler, you’ll see the following information:

Script loaded at 7:15:26.  Ready for connections.
0: GET /;
1: GET /796-SCRIPTPretendingToBeAImg.js;
2: GET /796-SCRIPTNOTPretendingToBeAImg.js;
1: Error: An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine
3: GET /UseTheScript.htm;
4: GET /796-SCRIPTPretendingToBeAImg.js; Range: bytes=4237-; If-Range: "796";

The line in yellow shows where the Script-fetched-by-IMG download was aborted, closing the connection. Later, session #4 shows that, when navigating to the second page of the repro, the browser sends a HTTP request asking for a partial download of the remainder of the script file.

If you use Fiddler to monitor this scenario, you’ll see that it doesn’t repro unless you enable Streaming Mode. That’s because, by default, Fiddler fully buffers each response and delivers it to the client in one shot, which means that the image object won’t have the chance to abort until the download has already been completed and cached. This reiterates the fact that using IMG for pre-fetch can succeed—but only under the best of network conditions.

The same abort behavior exists in IE6 to IE10, and Firefox 12.0. Opera 11.61, Chrome 18, and Safari 5.1.5 do not appear to abort when invalid image content is downloaded.

Interestingly, Firefox does not appear to cache even the partial file; when it re-downloads the script, the request does not contain a Range header. That behavior might be explained if Firefox uses a separate cache for IMG requests vs. other tags (an architecture that I believe Mozilla used at some point). Further evidence pointing in this direction exists. If you update the MeddlerScript so that the first request completes so quickly that the client has no chance to abort, Firefox still re-downloads the script file on the second page of the repro.

Script loaded at 7:31:39.  Ready for connections.
0: GET /;
1: GET /143-SCRIPTPretendingToBeAImg.js;
2: GET /143-SCRIPTNOTPretendingToBeAImg.js;
3: GET /usethescript.htm;
4: GET /143-SCRIPTPretendingToBeAImg.js;

When the Web Developer who encountered this problem asked me for alternatives, my first thought was to try using IE’s startDownload method, which I hoped would accommodate their scenario, even though the method is limited to Same-Origin requests. Unfortunately, it turns out that startDownload isn’t a suitable replacement, because downloads initiated by this method are conducted with a no-cache flag, such that the cache is bypassed when making the request, and the response isn’t committed to the cache.

HTML5 proposes an explicit prefetch Link relation to allow clients to recognize resources for which pre-fetching may be beneficial. Internet Explorer 9 and 10 use these LINKs to perform DNS-prefetching; resources are not downloaded.

-Eric

PS: Using IMG tags to pre-fetch images is, of course, entirely fine… so long as you’re not trying to pre-fetch images from HTTP on a page delivered by HTTPS. Doing that will cause a Mixed-Content problem and your page’s lock icon will disappear.

  • This is insane ^^

    Nice to know, anyway.

  • Eric, nice detective work! Curious, how does IE behave with similar setup on object tags? In theory doing this kind of "prefetching" via the object tag should avoid the aborted parse. Having said that, as you pointed out, this entire "prefetching hack", is just that.. and something I hope we can migrate away from.

  • @igrigorik: I can't seem to get an OBJECT tag not to cause the same problem (in Standards mode, at least). It's possible that there's some combination of parameters that would work, but I don't know what the combination would be.

  • Yuck! using an <img> for this is very dirty. I'd definitely go for an <object> element.

    @EricLaw, did you try <object type="text/plain" data="scriptNeededLater.js" ></object> ? That way there is no "pretending" to be totally different kind of resource. It's the same resource, treated with a more generic content type.

  • @Mathieu: You can trivially modify the MeddlerScript provided above to test that combination. Unfortunately, you'll find that the first page only makes a HEAD request for the object, determines that its MIME type isn't something it plans to render, then stops. You could go further and ensure that the resource itself is delivered using a text/plain Content-Type, but even if that helped, it's not recommended because it will break if the response has an X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff directive, and it messes with the cache scavenger (files with JavaScript MIMEs are less likely to get cleaned up than other types).

  • Eric, I'm having trouble parsing your double negative in your reply to igrigorik.  Your statement is intended to translate as "I can't make OBJECT tags work either", right?  We've got a page that's trying to do preloading for JS files (that will be used on a subsequent page) with Mathieu's technique.  IE10 does the HEAD request, then IE10 also does the GET request - but Fiddler shows the request as "aborted" and the resource is not actually cached.  It's hard to tell how much of the file IE10 actually downloaded.

  • Let me state it directly: Don't try to use the OBJECT tag, it won't help you. For IE11+, use link rel="prefetch".

  • @EricLaw: You said that In IE the partial download gets cached if there are Content-Length and ETag headers. What about if there was Last-Modified instead of ETag - it should be the same, shouldn't it?

    [EricLaw]: In IE9 at least, resuming a partial download requires that the response contain a strong ETAG; a response containing only a Last-Modified date will not be resumed:

Page 1 of 1 (8 items)
Leave a Comment
  • Please add 1 and 4 and type the answer here:
  • Post