<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx</link><description>Yesterday, we posted a blog entry that detailed some upcoming JavaScript and CSS support enhancements that we are planning on making to the IE Mobile browser for Windows Phone 7. One of these changes, support for -webkit-text-size-adjust, stirred up a</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10121784</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:45:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10121784</guid><dc:creator>Dean H.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m a developer for a large Mobile Web Development firm. We have been anxiously awaiting Windows Phone 7 since it&amp;#39;s announcement. Sadly, we purchased an HTC HD7 for testing and have come to discover that is just as horrible as Windows Mobile 6; No support for inline-block, improper support for floats, and no float clearing. Until you guys get your act together and start producing a product that supports basic CSS, we&amp;#39;re going to continue to tell our clients that we will not support your browser, and users of it will get an unstyled plain-text version of the site, while people using Webkit, Blackberry, and Netfront will get the full experience. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10121784" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10055351</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:47:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10055351</guid><dc:creator>Adrian Schmidt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@saurik Your lack of foresight makes me cry. &amp;quot;In this case, for a large number of websites, users of Windows Phone 7 devices are now going to suffer, That really sucks.&amp;quot; Well, it might suck a little, but nothing at all compared to having the next ten years of web development suck as bad as the last ten!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am very happy that Microsoft has finally started to pay attention to voices outside their own company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10055351" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10043220</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:08:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10043220</guid><dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Dave. @Saurik is right. In all cases. Accept that and move on while I open Cydia and enjoy downloading some new Winterboard themes. You are awesome Jay.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also I agree with him. Having another tag to add just because of the prefix stinks. The reasoning is clearly stated in the blog post and the fact that MS is bending to some loud voices stinks. If it already exists and does what you want then just implement it the same and make that known. This is better for the community as a whole and saves a line of CSS that will be left off of every style sheet in the future. Unless there is a legal reason then this is the wrong choice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10043220" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10035539</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10035539</guid><dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Support HTML 5 and CSS3 and you&amp;#39;ll make a lot of developers lives a lot easier. DO IT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10035539" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10028955</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10028955</guid><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@saurik Want to make a web designer miserable? Have the same CSS rule do two divergent things depending on the browser? It&amp;#39;s why designers get so frustrated with IE 6 and 7 on the desktop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That they behave differently is fine and expected, but when it&amp;#39;s not part of the standard, don&amp;#39;t go emulating while making a fundamental underlying divergent implementation assumption that alters behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Revel in vendor-specific quirks until standards are settled upon and every browser (ideally) interprets the rules the same way. There are, after all, custom rules for Gecko, WebKit and Presto. Why not Trident?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10028955" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10021248</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:19:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10021248</guid><dc:creator>Jay Freeman (saurik)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Just because these people are loud, that does not make them correct. Just because user agents became worthless, that does not mean that they would have worked if only everyone decided not to superset each other&amp;#39;s strings. Personally, I look to Microsoft to follow a fairly consistent internal version of what is right, and to be able to ignore the throngs of people who loudly proclaim they are evil and wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vendor prefixes should be seen as a way to keep people from conflicting when they make up new selector names: it shield not, once that name is created, keep everyone else from trying to be compatible with it. You may as well claim hay WebKit has an &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; software patent on this particular selector name now, and Microsoft isn&amp;#39;t allowed to reverse engineer it, even for the legally legitimate reason to be compatible with someone else&amp;#39;s implementation. ;(&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this case, for a large number of websites, users of Windows Phone 7 devices are now going to suffer, That really sucks. ;( Somehow we&amp;#39;ve ended up in a world where &amp;quot;embrace and extend&amp;quot; is totally allowed, and if anyone else attempts to be comparable with your extension they are being evil. Frankly, if anyone but Microsoft had been the first to do this, I can&amp;#39;t imagine they would have gotten any flak for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10021248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10017520</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 19:31:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10017520</guid><dc:creator>Viktor Krammer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;cool Star Trek picture :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10017520" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10017519</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 19:30:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10017519</guid><dc:creator>Viktor Krammer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;cool Star Trek pic :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10017519" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10012679</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 19:07:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10012679</guid><dc:creator>Zirro</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not that I like IE very much (IE6 and 7 still forces me to spend several extra hours working around issues), but I'm glad you took this decision. Vendor prefixes should strictly be used only by their native rendering engine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After all, this is the same problem that created the user-agent mess: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history"&gt;http://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it's great that you are open with these kinds of decisions too, and just didn't decide to support these things &amp;quot;behind the scenes&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10012679" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Update: CSS and js support in ie Mobile for Windows phone 7</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/iemobile/archive/2010/05/11/update-css-and-js-support-in-ie-mobile-for-windows-phone-7.aspx#10012087</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:35:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10012087</guid><dc:creator>IE Mobile Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, we are building in the ability to update the browser independently of firmware.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-joe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10012087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>