<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>NUnit Converter V0.3</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jamesnewkirk/archive/2005/07/06/435953.aspx</link><description>There is a new version (0.3) of the converter in the GotDotNet workspace. Click here to download. 
 This version adds support for VB.NET and fixes a few bugs that I discovered as I did more extensive acceptance testing. I have done much more acceptance</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: NUnit Converter V0.3</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jamesnewkirk/archive/2005/07/06/435953.aspx#435982</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:53:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:435982</guid><dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator><description>I'm a big Microsoft fan, but it's things like this that really annoy me.  Why replace NUnit?  It's good, it works, it's all but an accepted &amp;quot;standard&amp;quot;.  Microsoft have the &amp;quot;Not Written Here&amp;quot; disesase in spades.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MS should actually contribute something to NUnit, not try and stamp it out.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I shall be voting with my feet on this one.  CruiseControl.NET, NAnt, NUnit and SVN or similar (Clearcase currently).   &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=435982" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>