<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rick Jeliffe of the Australian Delegation Commented on the BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/03/rick-jeliffe-of-the-australian-delegation-commented-on-the-brm.aspx</link><description>Rick has pulled his blog posting about the BRM for the moment due to the fact that he will be reporting into Standards Australia about the meeting. His original post can be found in web caches and he is being quoted on other blogs. I will include one</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Rick Jeliffe of the Australian Delegation Commented on the BRM</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonmatusow/archive/2008/03/03/rick-jeliffe-of-the-australian-delegation-commented-on-the-brm.aspx#8067282</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:40:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8067282</guid><dc:creator>Glen Turner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since Rick had removed his comments, perhaps you could have considered not posting an extract?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, I recall that Rick's blog entry was not a fully positive as your excerpt. I recall that it noted that some issues which should be considered by National Bodies were not able to be considered at the Ballot Resolution Meeting (licenses, etc).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8067282" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>