http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonz/archive/2006/07/19/672052.aspxThe Channel 9 gang has just posted a video I did with Duncan on the .NET FX 3.0. Hopefully the video will help clear up many of the questions we have seen. Keep your questions/feedback coming!en-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonz/archive/2006/07/19/672052.aspx#736917Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:07:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:736917Paul Gielens:ThoughtsServiceConsumers of the .NET Framework more andmore question the reasoning behind .NET Framework versioning.<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=736917" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonz/archive/2006/07/19/672052.aspx#685339Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:38:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:685339Mike CattleI take it then that we have to wait until version (3.5) to see any improvements in the programming languages? &nbsp;In particular, I'm looking forward to seeing anonymous methods in VB.NET.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=685339" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jasonz/archive/2006/07/19/672052.aspx#674668Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:35:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:674668Chris NahrNice video and good explanation! Just one question: what's that curious black &amp; white photo on your office wall? :)<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=674668" width="1" height="1">