<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx</link><description>A question that has been asked a lot is: "How does the Ribbon scale down?" 
 Anytime you see the Ribbon demoed live, you'll see it at 1024x768 resolution. Why? Simply because that's the native resolution of most projectors. If you saw my presentation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>farbliche Darstellung von 2007 ?ndern (Kontrast) | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#9347313</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:24:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9347313</guid><dc:creator>farbliche Darstellung von 2007 ?ndern (Kontrast) | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.com/711690-farbliche-darstellung-von-2007-aendern"&gt;http://www.hilpers.com/711690-farbliche-darstellung-von-2007-aendern&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9347313" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Office 2007 UI Bible | MS Tech News</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#9019248</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:25:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9019248</guid><dc:creator>The Office 2007 UI Bible | MS Tech News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mstechnews.info/2008/10/the-office-2007-ui-bible/"&gt;http://mstechnews.info/2008/10/the-office-2007-ui-bible/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9019248" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>running higher then native resolution</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#8825882</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:47:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8825882</guid><dc:creator>running higher then native resolution</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cael.freevideonewsnetwork.info/runninghigherthennativeresolution.html"&gt;http://cael.freevideonewsnetwork.info/runninghigherthennativeresolution.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8825882" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>You never know until you test it with real users</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#553736</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:00:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:553736</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>Speculate all you want; the proof is in the pudding.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=553736" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Importance Of Labels The Importance Of Labels The Importance Of Labels The Importance Of Labels</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#532321</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:532321</guid><dc:creator>Jensen Harris: An Office User Interface Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;My first experience in Office was working as an intern program manager on&lt;br&gt;Outlook 98.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; During...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=532321" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#484561</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:484561</guid><dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator><description>&amp;gt; Just can't imagine how a primary window can be not maximized... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At 1600x1200 in word, most of the space would be wasted outside the page margins. Even if it weren't that's too long a line to comfortably follow with the eye.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(About the only things I run maximised are those were the extra width is usefully used: Visio, Project and Visual Studio (where it is the tool windows making use of the horizontal space.)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=484561" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#483193</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:07:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:483193</guid><dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;I don't understand why you would want the information on the screen to get bigger as you increase the resolution.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reduce eyestrain.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=483193" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#483093</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:34:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:483093</guid><dc:creator>jojjp</dc:creator><description>I don't understand why you would want the information on the screen to get bigger as you increase the resolution. For me, the only reason I keep getting bigger screens is that i want to be able to fit more on it - having application increase in size defeats the entire purpose.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=483093" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#483047</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:17:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:483047</guid><dc:creator>Somebody</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Scaling a tab takes a lot of design effort to get right, and we spend a lot of time on the craft. Some have wondered why we don't just have a computer algorithm that decides all the layouts (or, even better, auto-optimizes them)&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How do you intend to do localizations of the UI? Spend a lot of time again for each language?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=483047" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Scaling Up, Scaling Down</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jensenh/archive/2005/10/18/482233.aspx#482820</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 01:27:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:482820</guid><dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Apple has added a 'zoom' (prototype) feature to windows that allow you to magnify any window to give the effect Charles is looking for. I don't know how close this feature is to being complete, but I'd expect it in either 10.5 or 10.6. So if the text labels in (say) Word are too teeny, you can hit some widget on the titlebar of the window to 'zoom in' and magnify everything.&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, I am not looking for any effect that would require me to scroll my desktop or have parts of it appear disproportionate to other parts.  What I meant that rather than running 800 x 600 at 96 dpi, I would want 1600 x 1200 at 192 dpi. Fonts would display at 16 pt instead of 8 pt, 20 pt instead of 10 pt, etc. Icons would be 32 x 32 instead of 16 x 16. There would be exactly the same amount of information on the visible screen--something 5 inches high at 800 x 600 would also be 5 inches high at 1600 x 1200--but it would look much sharper.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=482820" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>