We've all encountered people who use big words just to impress folks. I think the smarter people communicate with succinct phrases that their audience immediately understands and cleverly convey specific concepts. Some of my favorite vocabulary:

  • Future-proofing:   Trying to build in flexibility to a product so that it can deal with future scenarios. This may include adding hooks or knobs, or just doing good design.  IMO, making all the methods on a class virtual is an example of attempting to future-proof something (although arguably a bad idea).
  • Policy-Shield:  When you don't know the policy for problem X, show that problem X is the same as another higher-profile problem Y for which you do know the policy. Then problem Y serves as a policy shield for problem X.
  • Design-Shield:  Design your product to solve problem Z not because problem Z is so important, but because the solution for Z likely solves many additional unforeseen problems. Design shield has similar piggybacking as in policy-shield, and also has aspects of future-proofing.
  • Feature-creep: When more features continually get added ("creep") into the product.
  • Sacrificial Thread:  I first heard Chris Brumme use this phrase when talking about creating a dedicated thread to do one task and die, rather than contaminate the main thread.  This could be used with other nouns like "Sacrificial Process","Sacrificial message", etc.

I'm problem missing a ton. What are you favorites?

Why not "synergy"?
Words like "Synergy" became an insanely common buzzword in the 90s. However, "synergy" is so lame because it's just a synonym for "teamwork", but doesn't really describe anything new and is no more articulate (and is even an additional syllable).