<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Harness that Attach instead of Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx</link><description>I've given sample code for MDbg-based harnesses that launch an app and then print all loaded modules or print exceptions that occur. In both cases, the harness launches the app. One reader asked how to modify them to attach to an existing app. It's actually</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Tool to get snapshot of managed callstacks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#647614</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:09:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:647614</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall's .NET Debugging Blog</dc:creator><description>I wrote a simple tool to take a snapshot of a running managed process and dump the output as an XML file....&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=647614" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>good</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#459606</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 05:52:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:459606</guid><dc:creator>Mira</dc:creator><description>Your blog is very interesint&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=459606" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Harness that Attach instead of Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#452962</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:52:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:452962</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall - MSFT</dc:creator><description>Alexey - Yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452962" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Harness that Attach instead of Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#452732</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:53:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:452732</guid><dc:creator>Alexey Medvedev</dc:creator><description>Do ICorDebug call &amp;quot;fake&amp;quot; callbacks in Framework 1.0 and Framework 1.1?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=452732" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Harness that Attach instead of Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#449435</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:56:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:449435</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall - MSFT</dc:creator><description>The order of the fake events are unspecified; although it's possible people may observe certain patterns (such as appearing to correlate to load order at times).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Likewise, in the current implementation, there is a pattern that could be used to find when the fake notifications end; but it is &lt;br&gt;a) not specified&lt;br&gt;b) highly implementation dependent.&lt;br&gt;c) may change in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=449435" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Harness that Attach instead of Launch</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#449432</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:35:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:449432</guid><dc:creator>Russ Osterlund</dc:creator><description>I am with you on the &amp;quot;mixed feelings.&amp;quot;  Do the fake module load events follow load or initialization order?  Do the fake create thread events follow the order the threads are created?  From your last statement I understand that there is no way, native or managed, to distinguish a fake from the real notification.  Is this correct?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=449432" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2005/08/08/attach-vs-launch.aspx#449252</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:06:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:449252</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=449252" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>