<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Resolving functions and func-eval syntax</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jmstall/archive/2006/07/21/resolving-functions.aspx</link><description>I got a question about MDbg's func-eval syntax, which brings up a nice point about function resolution: 
 
 Is it possible to evaluate a function by specifying an instance variable instead of the fully qualified name of the class? 
 f ex.get_StackTrace</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>