<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Everybody in the pool</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2005/03/19/399101.aspx</link><description>CNET has a lengthy piece on Ajax responding to the WSJ article. I agree with David Temkin: "The successors to Word and Excel and Powerpoint are not going to be written this way. It's just not going to happen."</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator></channel></rss>