<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Comments on Designers and Developers working together</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2005/09/26/474000.aspx</link><description>I turned on "comment approval" a while back and used to get e-mails
telling me comments were waiting. Apparently my Spam filter was
eating them, so I apologize to Daniel who posted several notes, in
particular this one: 
 
 
 
 John,
 
 
Mano</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Comments on Designers and Developers working together</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2005/09/26/474000.aspx#475030</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:15:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:475030</guid><dc:creator>mclement</dc:creator><description>Daniel,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feel free to ask me more questions regarding the design/code separation on my blog if you'd like :) - I think I replied to your last question a few days ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know it sounds too good to be true ;) although as John pointed out this is not HTML and it integrates all native controls and primitives needed by designers to define the view to hook to the code/model. This allowed us to think about the tools WHILE the platform is being worked on and provide our feedback to ensure the best workflow possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take care&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-mano&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=475030" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Model/View/ViewModel sounds promising</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2005/09/26/474000.aspx#474023</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:474023</guid><dc:creator>dhchait</dc:creator><description>John,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the thoughtful reply.  Specifically re: &amp;quot;m/v/vm&amp;quot; idea - I'd be eager to hear more about it, but it sounds like the idea would be to abstract, not only the &amp;quot;model&amp;quot; classically understood, but also the view or application interaction state, as distinct from the presentation layer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers - Daniel&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=474023" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>