http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2006/03/04/543695.aspxI've had several questions about when and why to use M-V-VM versus other approaches. The obvious purpose is abstraction of the View, reducing the amount of business logic or glue code stuck in code-behind. All tasty goodness abstractly, but here's anotheren-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2006/03/04/543695.aspx#9364852Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:31:21 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9364852How heavy are data-bindings in the latest WPF build? | keyongtech<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.keyongtech.com/1062679-how-heavy-are-data-bindings">http://www.keyongtech.com/1062679-how-heavy-are-data-bindings</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9364852" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johngossman/archive/2006/03/04/543695.aspx#774346Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:32:13 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:774346Bryant Likes's BlogIf you're doing WPF development, you really need to check out Dan Crevier 's series on DataModel-View-ViewModel.<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=774346" width="1" height="1">