Sign In
SpankyJ
Adventures in the guts of Oslo... M, Mg and other language fun...
Translate This Page
Translate this page
Powered by
Microsoft® Translator
Options
Email Blog Author
RSS for posts
Atom
RSS for comments
OK
Search
Advanced search options...
Search In:
Everything
Blogs
Forums
People
Groups
Places
Pages
Date range:
All Time
Last Year
Last 6 Months
Last 3 Months
Last Month
Last Week
Last Two Days
Tags
64bit CLR Implementation Goo
64bit non-managed rants and raves!
Writing agnostic code.
Writing code targeted at 64bit.
Archive
Archives
November 2008
(3)
November 2007
(1)
November 2006
(1)
August 2006
(4)
July 2006
(1)
August 2005
(4)
July 2005
(1)
May 2005
(1)
April 2005
(3)
October 2004
(4)
September 2004
(1)
April 2004
(4)
March 2004
(5)
August, 2005
MSDN Blogs
>
SpankyJ
>
August, 2005
Posts
Subscribe via RSS
Sort by:
Most Recent
|
Most Views
|
Most Comments
Excerpt View
|
Full Post View
SpankyJ
Blog about writing profiler stubs to interact with the 2.0 runtime.
Posted
over 7 years ago
by
joshwil
3
Comments
Check out this blog entry ( http://blogs.msdn.com/jkeljo/archive/2005/08/11/450506.aspx ) to see some information that is rather interesting to people writing managed profilers, and probably not very interesting to everyone else.
SpankyJ
BigArray<T>, getting around the 2GB array size limit
Posted
over 7 years ago
by
joshwil
14
Comments
I’ve received a number of queries as to why the 64-bit version of the 2.0 .Net runtime still has array maximum sizes limited to 2GB. Given that it seems to be a hot topic of late I figured a little background and a discussion of the options to get around...
SpankyJ
What is the difference in a P/Invoke signature between “byref byte” and “byte[]”?
Posted
over 7 years ago
by
joshwil
3
Comments
Lately we’ve seen a spate of issues coming up on 64-bit platforms within the Developer Division around usages of P/Invoke signatures which declare a parameter as type “byref byte” where the developer really means “byte[]” (the corresponding native parameter...
SpankyJ
Bit specific code in agnostic assemblies???
Posted
over 7 years ago
by
joshwil
7
Comments
In previous blog entries I’ve spent some time talking about how to mark assemblies as bit specific and how the loader deals with those markings. What however is the preferred mode of an application? I will posit that it is to be compiled agnostic and...
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)