.Net framework SP and Publisher Policy

re: .Net framework SP and Publisher Policy

beautyispower — Mon, 01 Nov 2004 13:35:00 GMT

很库啊！

.Net Framework Service Pack and Publisher Policy

Junfeng Zhang — Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:21:00 GMT

re: .Net framework SP and Publisher Policy

Junfeng Zhang — Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:31:00 GMT

Thank you Michele for understanding our position. It is a tough decision. But we believe it is the best we should do within current policy system.

We are planning to change the policy system in the future to facilitate servicing of a group of assemblies like framework assemblies. It will be a huge shift from the current policy system, and it probably will come in the version after Whidbey. We will see how that goes.

re: .Net framework SP and Publisher Policy

Michele Leroux Bustamante — Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:12:00 GMT

Thank you for this clarification Junfeng. After giving this some thought, I agree that you made the right choice not to version the assemblies this time around. I made a more detailed commentary on my concerns and wishes on the subject here:

http://www.dasblonde.net/PermaLink.aspx?guid=5064d95e-5b3c-4f9c-8f22-d6eb9f04f67b

Why there's a Service Pack and not (also) a new version of the .net Framework ? The Answer.

Rolando Ramirez Weblog @ DotNetJunkies — Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:28:00 GMT

Why there's a Service Pack and not (also) a new version of the .net Framework ? The Answer.

Framework 1.x SP Oddity - Answered

Omer van Kloeten's .NET Zen — Mon, 11 Oct 2004 23:08:00 GMT