<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reverse Engineering Styles in Avalon Using System.Windows.Serialization.Parser</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/karstenj/archive/2005/07/22/441959.aspx</link><description>A key tenet of Avalon is "lookless" controls: a button should simply be the idea of a button, not the actual button -- very Platonic, really. Now, the platform would not be very useful if all we provided was the idea of a button, so each content control</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Default WPF Control Templates &amp;laquo; .NET Framework 3.0 { WPF, WCF, WF, CardSpace }</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/karstenj/archive/2005/07/22/441959.aspx#1319571</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1319571</guid><dc:creator>Default WPF Control Templates « .NET Framework 3.0 { WPF, WCF, WF, CardSpace }</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://netfx30.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/default-wpf-control-templates/"&gt;http://netfx30.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/default-wpf-control-templates/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1319571" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Expression Interactive Designer: Three Discoveries</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/karstenj/archive/2005/07/22/441959.aspx#529743</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:529743</guid><dc:creator>IRhetoric - Karsten Januszewski  </dc:creator><description>I decided to try and improve the look of my Sandbox3D by opening and styling it in Expression Interactive...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=529743" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Looks like an useful tip</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/karstenj/archive/2005/07/22/441959.aspx#443129</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:38:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:443129</guid><dc:creator>the roarty blog</dc:creator><description>This looks like an useful tip - Avalon controls have a default style and you can get that information...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=443129" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Reverse Engineering Styles in Avalon Using System.Windows.Serialization.Parser</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/karstenj/archive/2005/07/22/441959.aspx#441987</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:48:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:441987</guid><dc:creator>PatriotB</dc:creator><description>Let's just hope that people USE the default styles.  A common fear is that, since Avalon makes it easy to create such fancy UIs, that they will all be completely different and inconsistent.  Hopefully developers will keep this in mind and use the defaults (which I assume are based on the user's visual style).&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=441987" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>