http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspxAccording to the BOL, the recommended way of yielding to other workers in SQLCLR is to call System.Thread.Sleep(0). Long before Yukon shipped, I had a conversation with a coworker who was responsible for knowing something about SQLCLR, and I asked howen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#9755079Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:01:49 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9755079 Ken Henderson s WebLog Sleeping vs Yielding | debt consolidator<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mydebtconsolidator.info/story.php?id=11530">http://mydebtconsolidator.info/story.php?id=11530</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9755079" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#9742585Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:53:19 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9742585 Ken Henderson s WebLog Sleeping vs Yielding | Insomnia Cure<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=217">http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=217</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9742585" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#1434880Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:17:54 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1434880SKV<p>So, after How can I &nbsp;yield CPU to another thread?</p> <p>I like idea about better system design but I am given the system that relys on it.</p> <p>How about this: I need to detect locking situations with Crititcal sections. I have to try to enter critical section and yeild control for x ms if it is taken. After some timeout period I report error... What is the best way to yeild control:</p> <p>1. SwitchThread - bypass low priority threads :(</p> <p>2. Sleep(0) &lt;=&gt; &nbsp;SwitchThread bypass low priority threads :( </p> <p>3. Sleep(1) &lt;- Less then OS time quant</p> <p>4. Sleep(15) &lt;- OS time quant ??? (OS/CPU dependent)</p> <p>5. Other</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1434880" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#581661Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:32:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:581661Jeff W. BarnesComparison of AJAX frameworks for ASP.NET <br>Extending CodeSmith merge functionality <br>Good read on SQLCLR...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=581661" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#560042Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:23:51 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:560042Professional Association for SQL Server (PASS) SIG<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=560042" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#553170Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:30:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:553170Jeff Barnes - MCSDComparison of AJAX frameworks for ASP.NET <br>Extending CodeSmith merge functionality <br>Good read on SQLCLR...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=553170" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#526304Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:36:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:526304Professional Association for SQL Server (PASS) SIG<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=526304" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#524146Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:37:04 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:524146Jeff Barnes - MCSD <br>Comparison of AJAX frameworks for ASP.NET <br>Extending CodeSmith merge functionality <br>Good read on...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=524146" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#523780Fri, 03 Feb 2006 06:42:10 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:523780Dean HardingIt was more a suggestion that instead of Sleep(0) (or yielding or whatever) you'd generally be better off using proper synchronization primitives, rather they relying on the scheduler to schedule your task in a &quot;deterministic&quot; way.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=523780" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/khen1234/archive/2006/02/02/523623.aspx#523716Fri, 03 Feb 2006 04:46:53 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:523716MSDNArchiveYou're right -- I've fixed the links. <br/> <br/>As to your question, I'm not sure I follow it. I'm especially tired at the moment, so maybe it's just me. <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=523716" width="1" height="1">