July, 2008

Larry Osterman's WebLog

Confessions of an Old Fogey
  • Larry Osterman's WebLog

    Oh Wow, Dr. Horrible is AWESOME!

    • 4 Comments

    Someone just pointed me to http://www.drhorrible.com, which is Joss Whedon’s newest epic.

    The first two acts are up on the web (the final act will go up on Saturday).

    They are spectacularly cool, especially to a musical nut.  I knew that Neil Patrick Harris had great musical chops (after all, he did Assassins on Broadway) but the rest was just fantastic.

     

    Well worth checking out, there are some really funny bits.  They did a truly great job on it.

  • Larry Osterman's WebLog

    Whatever happened to Wave Out Mix?

    • 18 Comments

    The Intertubes are all atwitter with reports that  Dell and other OEMs colluded with the RIAA to disable the Wave Out Mix option on new laptops.

    Wow, what a tempest in a teapot.  I just LOVE watching conspiracy theories as the echo chamber does it’s magic.

     

    And of course it’s almost certainly hogwash (I don’t know for sure, but I do know that some of the rumors are totally stupid).

    First off, what is Wave Out Mix?  It’s an option that some audio manufacturers added to their audio hardware (Creative calls it “What U Hear”).  Typically the Wave Out Mix is implemented by connecting the analog output from the DAC (Digital-to-Audio Converter) to a specific input on the ADC (Analog-to-Digital Converter) which is labeled as “Wave Out Mix”.

    If you record on the Wave Out Mix input, you will capture the samples that are being played via Wave Out.

     

    In Windows Vista, by default we only enable microphone, line in and digital inputs to the audio hardware (the theory being that users typically only want to be able to listen to those inputs).  If the audio solution offers other inputs, they’re still there but we bury them somewhat. 

    You can find those additional inputs in mmsys if you start the sound control panel and go to the “Recording” tab.  If you right click and select “Show Disabled Devices” you can enable those alternate inputs.

    In addition, these days many OEMs don’t bother adding the Wave Out Mix support.  It costs slightly more to order chips with Wave Out Mix support than it does to order chips without the functionality, and OEMs are incredibly cost conscious.  The other reason is that for those OEMs that implemented the Wave Out Mix with an analog tap, you can achieve almost the same results with a $2.50 analog cable run between the output and the line in input of the machine.

     

    Part of the reason that I know that this is just a conspiracy theory running rampant is that Windows Vista built the support for the Wave Out Mix input directly into the operating system.  If you pass the AUDCLNT_STREAMFLAGS_LOOPBACK flag to the IAudioClient::Initialize method, then the audio system will initialize the engine in loopback mode.  You can start capturing data off that IAudioClient object and you’ll get the post-mix output for the endpoint. 

    The loopback support was designed primarily for use by AEC functionality (which needs to be able to know what samples are being played), but it also allows you to perform essentially the same functionality as the Wave Out Mix hardware used to do.

    If you want to play with the loopback functionality, the WinAudio SDK sample application allows you to capture using the loopback functionality.

  • Larry Osterman's WebLog

    In which Larry goes back to college for the first time in over 20 years.

    • 16 Comments

    Last weekend we dropped Daniel off at Carnegie-Mellon for summer school (the CMU drama school’s pre-college musical theater program).  It was essentially the first time I’d gone back to CMU since I graduated (we visited for a couple of hours back in 1992, but we spent most of the time visiting friends in the area and very little time on campus). 

    We got in on Friday afternoon, got our car and headed in.  I have to admit that it felt quite strange seeing all the landmarks as we drove in from the airport.  We got onto 376 and headed west towards CMU. 

    We drove around the campus pointing out all the relevant locations to Daniel and Sharron.  Then we parked the car and took an impromptu tour of the campus.

    Even after 25 years, the campus hasn’t changed very much.  They’ve built a couple of new buildings on the cut (a large swatch of lawn that runs from Forbes Ave to the Hunt Library).  I like the new performing arts center (not surprisingly, they have a killer theater), but not the new campus center (the space itself seems to be fine, I just dislike how the building looks).

    My biggest shock happened when we entered Doherty Hall.  I hadn’t realized it, but the building still had the same smell to it.  I know it’s weird, but I associate memories with odors, and Doherty has a distinct smell that is still there.  I was also surprised that they hadn’t really changed the two big lecture halls in Doherty.  We then wandered over to Science^H^H^H^H^H^HWean hall and started looking at the various professors offices.  Wean 7500 (the big lecture hall in Wean) also hasn’t changed in the past 25 years (although they did upgrade the lobby outside the lecture hall, go figure that one).

    We continued outside and eventually wandered up to Squirrel Hill to get dinner…

    Saturday was spent moving Daniel into his dorm room and attending various and sundry orientations, many of which were quite good (and some were utterly tedious).  Vaguely humorously, I ran into one father who was dropping his daughter off for the pre-college musical theater program.  He mentioned that his son was working at Microsoft for the summer :).  Strange world. 

     

    Sunday we went to Kennywood, which is Pittsburgh’s main amusement park (with some utterly killer roller coasters).  Fortunately it was threatening rain, so the crowds were light.  Again Kennywood is almost exactly as I remembered it; I have to say I was really impressed with what they’d done with the place – even though it’s on a major road, it feels both cozy and expansive at the same time.

    Sunday evening we went to the O’s for dinner; we’d spent the past 15 or so years raving about the place to our kids, we figured it would be a shame not to go there.  The hot dogs were just as good as I’d remembered.  After dinner, we caught up with a friend from college and spent a couple of hours catching up on old times (which wasn’t nearly enough time). 

    Monday we flew back to Seattle, we’re still tired from the trip, but it was a HUGE amount of fun.  I hadn’t realized just how much I had missed Pittsburgh all these years. 

  • Larry Osterman's WebLog

    BillG Memories, Part 2

    • 22 Comments

    Not surprisingly, as a peon, I don’t get to interact with Bill very often, so my few interactions are almost by definition memorable.

    I’ve posted this story before, but it deserves to be recycled in honor of Bill’s last few days.

    This happened back in the mid 1980’s, we were doing a project review for Lan Manager 1.0 with him. 

    One portion of the meeting was about my component, DOS Lan Manager (basically an enhanced version of the MS-NET redirector, with support for a fair number of the Lan Manager APIs on the client).  My boss and I were given the job of presenting the data for that portion.

    One of the slides (not Powerpoint, it didn’t exist at the time – Lucite slides on an overhead projector) we had covered the memory footprint of the DOS Lan Manager redirector.

    For DOS LM 1.0, the redirector took up 64K of RAM.

    And Bill went ballistic.

    “What do you mean 64K?  When we wrote BASIC, it only took up 8K of RAM.  What the f*k do you think idiots think you’re doing?  Is this thing REALLY 8 F*ing BASIC’s?”

    The only answer we could give him was “Yes”J.

    To this day, I sometimes wonder if he complains that Windows XP is “16,000 F*ing BASIC’s”.

    We didn't ignore Bill's comment, btw (you never want to do that).  We worked on reducing the footprint of the DOS redirector by first moving the data into LIM Extended memory, next by moving the code into expanded memory.  For LAN Manager 2.1, we finally managed to reduce the below 640K footprint of the DOS redirector to 128 bytes.  It took a lot of work, and some truly clever programming, but it did work.

    Since the last one was recycled, here’s a bonus BillG memory.  I may have discussed this one in the past in a C9 video but I can’t find any references on my blog about it.

    Shortly after my 15th anniversary at Microsoft, I got an invitation to a dinner at BillG’s house for all the employees with more than 15 years of service (I had just squeaked into that rather elite group).  There were about 100 of us with our significant others at the dinner, and not surprisingly Bill was totally mobbed (even among groups of old-timers Bill still gets loads of people pestering him, I guess it goes with the territory).  About half way through the dinner, Bill’s daughter and her nanny came out to play on the swings before bedtime. 

    Bill immediately disentangled himself from his various conversations and went over to the swing-set and spent about 20 minutes pushing his daughter on the swings.  He could have ignored her and let the nanny deal with it, he could have simply given his daughter good night kisses and gone back to the party, but he didn’t.  He blew all these hideously senior Microsoft people off and went to spend time with his daughter.

    That was when I realized how much parenthood had changed Bill for the better.

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)