<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Reason number 9,999,999 why you don’t ever use humorous elements in a shipping product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2011/05/02/reason-number-9-999-999-why-you-don-t-ever-use-humorous-elements-in-a-shipping-product.aspx</link><description>I just saw an email go by on one of our self hosting aliases: 
 
 From: &amp;lt;REDACTED&amp;gt; Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:27 PM To: &amp;lt;REDACTED&amp;gt; Subject: Spelling Mistake for browser in event viewer 
 Not sure which team to assign this to &amp;ndash;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Reason number 9,999,999 why you don’t ever use humorous elements in a shipping product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2011/05/02/reason-number-9-999-999-why-you-don-t-ever-use-humorous-elements-in-a-shipping-product.aspx#10165528</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:38:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10165528</guid><dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Add one more question to the 20 year count: what&amp;#39;s the joke?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A vague reference to dogs in your original post doesn&amp;#39;t explain why you named the service after fuel pumps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10165528" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Reason number 9,999,999 why you don’t ever use humorous elements in a shipping product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2011/05/02/reason-number-9-999-999-why-you-don-t-ever-use-humorous-elements-in-a-shipping-product.aspx#10161572</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 22:03:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10161572</guid><dc:creator>Jeroen Mostert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve never had an &amp;quot;abject lesson&amp;quot;, except maybe one or two times in high school. I guess this story could qualify as one, though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10161572" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Reason number 9,999,999 why you don’t ever use humorous elements in a shipping product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2011/05/02/reason-number-9-999-999-why-you-don-t-ever-use-humorous-elements-in-a-shipping-product.aspx#10161190</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:32:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10161190</guid><dc:creator>Maurits [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I take that back... apparently both are used&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10161190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Reason number 9,999,999 why you don’t ever use humorous elements in a shipping product</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2011/05/02/reason-number-9-999-999-why-you-don-t-ever-use-humorous-elements-in-a-shipping-product.aspx#10161189</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:30:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10161189</guid><dc:creator>Maurits [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;s/object/abject/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10161189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>