<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx</link><description>One question that periodically comes up is "Is &amp;lt;x&amp;gt; beta time bombed"? 
 First off, what's a time bomb? It's a chunk of code that's intended to disable a beta release sometime after the beta ships. 
 I believe that all MS beta products have to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> Larry Osterman s WebLog Why does Microsoft Time Bomb its beta releases | debt solutions</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#9790945</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:27:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9790945</guid><dc:creator> Larry Osterman s WebLog Why does Microsoft Time Bomb its beta releases | debt solutions</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=8866"&gt;http://debtsolutionsnow.info/story.php?id=8866&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9790945" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Please excuse the interruption</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#1475978</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:01:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1475978</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Regular readers may remember that little mini crisis that happened with Tysabri last year that I posted&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1475978" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>elevate|blog   &amp;raquo; Thursday&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#558333</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:46:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:558333</guid><dc:creator>elevate|blog   » Thursday…</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://elevate.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/thursday/"&gt;https://elevate.wordpress.com/2006/03/22/thursday/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=558333" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Other things people do with beta versions of the operating system</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#531799</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:00:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:531799</guid><dc:creator>The Old New Thing</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Somewhat belatedly&lt;br&gt;riffing on&lt;br&gt;Larry&lt;br&gt;and his discussion of&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;time bombs in beta products,&lt;br&gt;I'm reminded...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=531799" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Microsoft Timebombs beta releases</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#457046</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:33:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:457046</guid><dc:creator>Kieran Jacobsen's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=457046" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#450762</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:31:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:450762</guid><dc:creator>Cheong</dc:creator><description>Antonio,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have the same feeling. Actually I think RBA have a wrong vision on &amp;quot;open source&amp;quot; and some other subjects. And sadly I've seen posts on some BBS/newsgroups of non-American countries which promotes the use of Microsoft products made similar comments too. This is not necessarily his fault, but those who told him to think this way. So let's not get this thread flamed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[More out-topic to backup my comment above] It happenes to me that one day I've seen someone who claims to be one of the professors to say something like this within a BBS of one university. And students are supposed to trust what the professors said, so...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450762" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#450701</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:24:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:450701</guid><dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator><description>Larry, you didn't mention one pertinent downside of time bombs: accidentally leaving them in the final release.  This just happened w/ the HDA bus driver QFE - I believe it timed out just this week.  Oops!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-andrew&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450701" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#450661</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:43:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:450661</guid><dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator><description>First, I'd like to apologize for going off-topic!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Dean Harding and Norman Diamond:&lt;br&gt;Sorry, written words on a website don't carry emotions with them, we must evaluate what's being said without any emotional clues from the writer, so I sincerely didn't think his comments were ironic or sarcastic! To me, they seemed an expression of his real feelings, and as such, completely offensive! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Until himself tells me it was ironic or sarcastic, I stand with my view!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Norman Diamond:&lt;br&gt;I really didn't understand your comments about Brazil being on the same hemisphere of US!&lt;br&gt;Are you European? Did you really thought it was an ironic comment even before reading my answer?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Dave:&lt;br&gt;Ok, I don't have enough knowledge about these companies to evaluate if you're right or wrong, I won't comment it, then. But I wasn't trying to point good examples of successful corporations, I just wanted to show to Red Blooded American that what he side was completely unrealistic!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@ D. Philippe:&lt;br&gt;As I said initially, English is not my first language. So I'd like to ask you the exact meaning of &amp;quot;trolled&amp;quot;! &lt;br&gt;Sorry, I coulnd't find it on my dictionary, and I've seen it in several foruns and always wondered what was it's meaning...   :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, going on-topic! :)&lt;br&gt;@Aaron Hockley:&lt;br&gt;You said exactly what I was thinking when I read this post! Granted, there can be technical  reasons for time bombong betas, and I really think what Larry said makes sense. But event though engineers may have had good intentions when they decided by time bombing, it's obvious that this works really great for marketing purposes, as will make impossible for people to keep using the betas for free without limitations.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450661" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#450652</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:19:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:450652</guid><dc:creator>Norman Diamond</dc:creator><description>Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:45 AM by Andreas Johansson &lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; Norman, is that the left of the right hemisphere? ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The new hemisphere.  So new that it didn't even exist when it was occupied by American native races ^_-&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450652" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why does Microsoft "Time Bomb" its beta releases?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/larryosterman/archive/2005/08/10/450173.aspx#450466</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:44:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:450466</guid><dc:creator>SuperBK</dc:creator><description>How about time bombs in production software?  A partner wanted me to put a time bomb in because the customer had 30 days to pay the balance after installation of his &amp;quot;system&amp;quot;.  So sure enough, he forgot to pay until the last minute and we had to rush a release to him to keep it going. The whole thing was silly and we it made the customer think we didn't trust him.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=450466" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>