The easiest way to create business applications for the Desktop and the Cloud
In this post, I’m going to introduce two scenarios now possible with the person type using the Office Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2013 – March 2014 Update. If you are unfamiliar with the person business type in Cloud Business Apps, team members Karol Zadora-Przylecki and Ravi Eda wrote an article on Using the Person Business Type.
Imagine the scenario Contoso Inc. has a SQL database that contains all their employee information. Using the latest Office Developer Tools for Visual Studio, they can connect the employees in the current database to their O365 profiles and get Lync presence, people picker, etc.
Suppose this is what the employee table in the database looks like:
If the data sources have properties that logically represent people, like a property on the entity which could resolve to a person type (i.e. email address), we now support the SharePoint person type out of box so they can be displayed as an O365 Person. At this time, we rely on the O365 tenant and do not support external contacts.
In this example, after attaching to the existing database, the Employee entity is shown like this in the Data Designer when we set the Email properties to be of type Person.
In the property grid for this entity's HTML Client view of the Data Designer, set the Summary property to be Email.
The summary property creates a summary control which used on the Screen Designer by default when you create a screen or drag and drop a related entity. Prior to March 2014 Office Tools update, the summary control always displayed the summary property as a text value ignoring the business type of the summary property. So if a summary property was of type Person and contained an Email address, only the email address string would show up. Now if the summary control is a Person type, application users will get the person viewer experience.
In the example, let's add a common screen set for this Employee entity. The browse screen looks like the following:
The properties of the underlying control are visible in the properties window. For the People viewer you get the option of choosing whether to display the Name only or the Name + Picture, as shown above.
After deploying the application, the summary property will be displayed with the default viewer control of the underlying semantic type. This is the Person Viewer control for summary property of type Person in our example.
In addition, we now allow you to use the Person Viewer Control in the Screen Designer on any email property. Below is a picture of all the available controls for a property of type email.
You no longer have to mark a property as being a Person to use the Person Viewer. While you won't get the full benefits of the Person Type, like the APIs, you can at least get the benefit of using the Person Viewer Control easily.
Imagine Contoso Inc. is managing its hiring process through a SharePoint list. They have a Job Postings list that lists the title of job, hiring manager, etc. Contoso wants to create a Cloud Business App that can provide more sophisticated tools to manage the hiring process while continuing to use existing data stored in the SharePoint list. The app developers can use any person column on the SharePoint list and they will automatically light up as a person in the app.
Prior to March 2014 Update, all the columns of type Person in SharePoint are defined as UserInformationList but did not map to the Person type. So these fields did not have the People picker control. Now you can get the people picker control for all the SharePoint columns of type Person.
In this example, after attaching to the SharePoint Job Posting list, the Email / WorkEmail property in UserInformationList are automatically set to type Person and set as the summary property.
Prior to March 2014 Update,
Now the Email/WorkEmail property field type is a Person and the Summary Property is automatically set to Email/WorkEmail.
Let’s look at a common screen set for this SharePoint List entity. On the Add/Edit screen, the default control for Hiring Manager (of person type) was User Information List prior to March 2014 Update. Now it’s the Person Picker Control.
Prior to March 2014 Update
Prior to March 2014 Update, only limited people is listed in the modal picker for a deployed application. Now the app shows People Picker instead of Modal Picker and the People Picker goes against all SharePoint User Store in O365, not just the ones in the UserInformationList.
We hope that you find the improvements to the Person Type useful in your CBA applications. Please note, to get the new behavior you will need to upgrade your existing projects created prior to having the Office Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2013 – March 2014 Update installed. To do this, right-click on your project and select “Upgrade”.
Rui Xie, Software Development Engineer in Test - Cloud Business Apps Team
Cannot see person type in the screen designer.
Person type was introduced in Visual Studio 2013 and should be available to pick from in the data entity designer. It'll be tricky to diagnose through the blog here, could you open a question post on the LightSwitch forum - social.msdn.microsoft.com/.../home. I'll follow up with you there. It will be great to add a screenshot to help us understand the issue you are running into.
I can choose the person type in Entity designer. I'm using my employee table and changed the email to person type.
When I create a browse screen for that table I get a lot of types but not the person viewer. The summary property is email.
Will it only work on SharePoint enabled apps or attached databases?
Thanks for providing more details, Sven. Person Viewer and Picker Controls are available in an HTML client of a SharePoint-enabled app. There are more information about the controls in this blog - blogs.msdn.com/.../using-the-person-business-type-karol-zadora-przylecki-ravi-eda.aspx,
My people picker is not showing authenticated external sharepoint users i.e. external users who have been invited to my Sharepoint site (as opposed to external contacts as mentioned above). Is this meant to be? Is there a work around?