<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Axum 0.2.0 Released!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maestroteam/archive/2009/06/24/axum-0-2-0-released.aspx</link><description>Are you excited? 
 We thought so. We’ve been listening to some of your pain points with Axum 0.1.0 and went straight to the kitchen to cook up 0.2.0 - now available for your code-slingin’ pleasure. We’ve fixed quite a few bugs and made some overall improvements</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Axum 0.2.0 Released!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maestroteam/archive/2009/06/24/axum-0-2-0-released.aspx#9850808</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:56:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9850808</guid><dc:creator>iRat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I found an VS error when formatting the Axum code. What should I do?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ratch&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9850808" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Axum 0.2.0 Released!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maestroteam/archive/2009/06/24/axum-0-2-0-released.aspx#9849260</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:42:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9849260</guid><dc:creator>Lasse Espeholt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, I think Axum overall is a nice initiative. And will follow the development with great interest. But I have a simple question regarding the language specs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do I have to use a receive() &amp;quot;method&amp;quot; when you shoud'nt use a send() &amp;quot;method&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;var adder = AdderAgent.CreateInNewDomain();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;adder::Num1 &amp;lt;-- 10;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;adder::Num2 &amp;lt;-- 20;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;// do something useful ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;var sum = receive(adder::Sum);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could have been written as:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;var adder = AdderAgent.CreateInNewDomain();&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;adder::Num1 &amp;lt;-- 10;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;adder::Num2 &amp;lt;-- 20;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;// do something useful ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;var sum = adder::Sum; //Or something clean like this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or would that interfere with other features?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9849260" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>