http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mahjayar/archive/2009/09/16/msf-v2-ctp2-deep-dive-memory-based-batching.aspxIts been quite a while since I posted about MSF v2 CTP2. As promised in my earlier posts I will be doing a series of deep-dive of the new SyncServices features added in MSF V2 CTP2. Today I am starting off with the Batching feature. One of the mosten-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mahjayar/archive/2009/09/16/msf-v2-ctp2-deep-dive-memory-based-batching.aspx#9901491Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:42:02 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9901491Sunil Vishnubhotla<P>Although, I am impressed by the new capability in handling conflicts including Constraint conflict, Conflict logging, Last-writer-wins conflict resolution and Improved simple provider conflict handling. I would not be putting this release into production as it is still a Community Technology Preview (CTP 2).</P> <P>Sunil</P> <P>&nbsp;</P> <P>[Maheshwar}Sunil, We did not ship a GoLive license with CTP2 so you are right that its not production approved. RTM is just around the corner.</P><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9901491" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mahjayar/archive/2009/09/16/msf-v2-ctp2-deep-dive-memory-based-batching.aspx#9901006Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:26:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9901006Don Gillis<P>Good to see that there is life to the framework. The unlimited batch size is, of course, not good with wcf tunneling either. It is not just a memory concern.</P> <P>Two questions:</P> <P>1. Can ctp2 be recommended for production use?</P> <P>[Maheshwar]No. We dont recommend going to production with CTP2.</P> <P>2. When will MSF2 be released? </P> <P>[Maheshwar] Just around the corner. </P> <P>Don</P><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9901006" width="1" height="1">