<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What's new in GC in CLR 4.5 from our team blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maoni/archive/2012/07/23/what-s-new-in-gc-in-clr-4-5-from-our-team-blog.aspx</link><description>This is now live from CLR's team blog. This paints a more complete picture than what I talked about in my "What's new in 4.5 GC" Channel 9 interview which mostly focused on Server Background GC. 
 http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2012/07/20/the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: What's new in GC in CLR 4.5 from our team blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maoni/archive/2012/07/23/what-s-new-in-gc-in-clr-4-5-from-our-team-blog.aspx#10392599</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:22:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10392599</guid><dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One small question regarding the 2GB array size limit waiver. The following MSDN help page: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh285054.aspx"&gt;msdn.microsoft.com/.../hh285054.aspx&lt;/a&gt; states that &amp;quot;The maximum size for strings and other non-array objects is unchanged.&amp;quot; Does it mean that we cannot create strings of size &amp;gt;2GB? If so, why this special treatment, after all strings are also arrays of unicode characters?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10392599" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What's new in GC in CLR 4.5 from our team blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maoni/archive/2012/07/23/what-s-new-in-gc-in-clr-4-5-from-our-team-blog.aspx#10386265</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:54:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10386265</guid><dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to quantify how long GC pauses are in a production environment without writing a custom profiler?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10386265" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: What's new in GC in CLR 4.5 from our team blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maoni/archive/2012/07/23/what-s-new-in-gc-in-clr-4-5-from-our-team-blog.aspx#10367719</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:32:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10367719</guid><dc:creator>Yuri Sokalsky</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is there only one GC per process (many app domains) and one managed heap per process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I have a few question regarding this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If we have a few Application Domains within a process, then each domain will share the heap between others domains. Is it safe? How this separation between domains performed?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10367719" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>