<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is all of software engineering dead?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/marcod/archive/2011/02/04/thedeadofsoftwareengineering.aspx</link><description>The subject matter of &amp;laquo; software engineering &amp;raquo; has been of enormous interest to me since youth. As usual for novel things, in the beginning it represented the most advanced form of professional thinking and behavior in software. The reason</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Is all of software engineering dead?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/marcod/archive/2011/02/04/thedeadofsoftwareengineering.aspx#10236430</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:15:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10236430</guid><dc:creator>Kashif</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with whatever Tom DeMarco said. Software Engineering as a discipline is far behind than original softwares developed now a days. Same is advocated here &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://computersrevealed.blogspot.com/2011/11/software-engineering-dead.html"&gt;computersrevealed.blogspot.com/.../software-engineering-dead.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10236430" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>