http://blogs.msdn.com/b/micahel/archive/2007/10/10/trickytrojans.aspxWayne writes seeking suggestions for dealing with simulacra of complex and complicated interfaces. While I usually want to do some end-to-end testing in order to see how the system as a whole functions, I generally prefer to do most of my testing at loweren-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/micahel/archive/2007/10/10/trickytrojans.aspx#5740858Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:19:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5740858Anutthara MSFT<p>Oh boy! I dunno if I would even attempt the VS plugin testing outside VS by simulating VS thingy. Even simple apps become highly tricky when trying to simulate stuff - and this one sounds like a killer.</p> <p>I've found that it helps a lot if you are able to predict upfront that you need a good testability point to replace dummy implementations with the real thing for your testing. Having that will make the dev watch out before making a big complicated mess of the simpler pieces of app as well. But of course, that's a luxury you have only if you are not saddled with testing legacy code.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5740858" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/micahel/archive/2007/10/10/trickytrojans.aspx#5392473Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:45:58 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5392473Techy News Blog » Tricky Trojans<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.artofbam.com/wordpress/?p=6881">http://www.artofbam.com/wordpress/?p=6881</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5392473" width="1" height="1">