While working on "Writing Secure Code for Windows Vista" I spent a good deal of time spelunking the new crypto stuff, CNG.
One of the APIs is BCryptResolveProviders, and the last argument is pretty complex:
In my opinion, this really should have been a couple of function calls, rather than one, I'm not a fan of functions with complex arguments. But that's just me.
But this got me thinking, if this is a new API, and the we're using SAL all over the place, then this argument must be annotated, right? Indeed it is. I open up bcrypt.h, and here is the function prototype, including SAL annotations.
__in_opt LPCWSTR pszContext,
__in_opt ULONG dwInterface,
__in_opt LPCWSTR pszFunction,
__in_opt LPCWSTR pszProvider,
__in ULONG dwMode,
__in ULONG dwFlags,
__inout ULONG* pcbBuffer,
__deref_opt_inout_bcount_part_opt(*pcbBuffer, *pcbBuffer) PCRYPT_PROVIDER_REFS *ppBuffer);
I had one of the SAL architects review it, and it's correct!