<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rotate it when vertical?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx</link><description>It was quite a while ago that I first posted Let's get vertical and talked about how prepending a font name with an @ would signal a font with knowledge of verticality to properly decide when to rotate glyphs 90 degrees. 
 I have been asked whether those</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Let's stand up a moment. You know, Vertically...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#10347311</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:05:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10347311</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve talked about vertical text support now and again over the years, for example in blogs like:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10347311" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Looking at life a bit more vertically, for a moment...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#10066181</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:19:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10066181</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The question Craig asked me last December was clear enough: When will Windows support a vertical layout&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10066181" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Expertise isn't always everything (aka When the one who is learning teaches us something important)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#7141261</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:47:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7141261</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The other day I was chatting by email with a developer on a unique problem -- she was trying to support&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7141261" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A whole new spin on the term 'Vertical markets' (aka in SiaO we trust?)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#6632939</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 21:04:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6632939</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the interesting side effects of having comments open all the time is that sometimes a post from&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6632939" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rotate it when vertical?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#2003075</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 07:05:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2003075</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that was a quote, of someone else's opinion.... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there are a whole lot of GDI functions related to fonts that are pretty nightmarish, and one almost has to believe that it is the hideously complex nature of what is underneasth that makes it so hard on top. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2003075" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rotate it when vertical?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2007/03/31/2000190.aspx#2003050</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 06:58:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2003050</guid><dc:creator>Si</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;it was Apple, who originally designed the core font technology for Windows,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft licensed TrueType from Apple. TueType is a &amp;quot;core font technology&amp;quot; for sure, but how does that explain the annoying APIs? I don't think you can blame Apple in this case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2003050" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>