http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspxThe MSDN documentation generally recommends that you use the static versions of libraries like the C Runtime (CRT) or the Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC). The reason for this is that the DLL versions have not been built for MSLU and thus have no knowledgeen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#577009Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:02:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:577009Sorting It All OutThe other day I got some mail about the instructions for rebuilding the Microsoft Foundation Classes...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=577009" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#561283Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:12:37 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:561283Sorting It All Out <br>Leandro Becker wrote to me via the contact link: <br> <br>HiWhen building the CRT 7.1 following your blog...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=561283" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#343621Wed, 29 Dec 2004 12:45:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:343621Uwe KeimThanks, Michael, this would be great! <br> <br>I would volunteer to sacrifice some nights/weekends for doing the builds (at least for MFC 7.1) :-)<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=343621" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#343559Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:09:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:343559Michael KaplanWell, I am not a lawyer, but as far as I know this is not allowed (I made a similar request once when the issue first came up). <br> <br>But I can always ask again -- it would really make sense, and be easier for everyone.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=343559" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#343553Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:50:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:343553Uwe KeimAnother suggestion: Would it be possible (i.e. legally ALLOWED) that someone (maybe I can do it by myself) prebuilds the library and makes it available for others to download as a single package so that one would just set up the correct source-, binary- and library paths?<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=343553" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2004/12/06/276124.aspx#333144Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:35:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:333144Uwe KeimVery interesting read!<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=333144" width="1" height="1">