<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why the proofing tools are all bundled....</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx</link><description>Earlier this month, saturnin02 posted the following opinion onto at least seven English and Italian Microsoft newsgroups, in response to a general thread about the Microsoft Proofing Tools and the fact that they basically bundle all of the languages together</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Foreign Language Spell Checkers | hilpers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#9356729</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:24:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9356729</guid><dc:creator>Foreign Language Spell Checkers | hilpers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.hilpers.it/1740656-foreign-language-spell-checkers"&gt;http://www.hilpers.it/1740656-foreign-language-spell-checkers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9356729" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Understanding (and explaining) why English is everywhere</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#825405</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:20:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:825405</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have mentioned Mike Williams once or twice in previous posts . He actually used to work for Microsoft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=825405" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The fonts are no charge, but the OS they are in has to cost something</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#793014</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:15:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:793014</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The question that came in was deceptively simple: Dear Sir, I am in Cambodia. I need Daunpenh and Moolbaran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=793014" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why the proofing tools are all bundled....</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#408791</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2005 07:24:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:408791</guid><dc:creator>Jesper Holmberg</dc:creator><description>On a, you know, somewhat related note...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...there's a reason the brits invented stamps. It simply proved cheaper to flat-fee all domestic letters, than to calculate the exact cost of delivering each letter. Even if you're just sending letters a short distance, you're generally better off than if you'd have to pay for the exact cost of delivering it plus the cost of calculating the exact cost.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=408791" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Bundling of Proofing Tools</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#407755</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:15:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:407755</guid><dc:creator>Thin Ice</dc:creator><description>&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407755" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why the proofing tools are all bundled....</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/04/12/407456.aspx#407471</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:41:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:407471</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>To clarify what I meant when I said &amp;quot;our own Mike Williams&amp;quot; I meant as a regular commenter here, he no longer works for Microsoft....&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=407471" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>