<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx</link><description>It is probable bordering on certainty that the Zombies were not singing about cultures in the .NET Framework in their song Time of the Season . Even in some kind of prophetic sense. 
 And while I'm sure there are parents out there who may not be keen</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>When features collide (aka Your LCID sucks, but sometimes the bug sucks more)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#9068714</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:02:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9068714</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Regular readers might recall a long ago blog entitled New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9068714" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A way better model for features, part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#1912176</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:32:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1912176</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You may have seen the first part of this series ( A way better model for features ). Think of this as&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1912176" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Not everything you might want out of a GetDateFormatEx, but think of it as a fixer-upper</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#827948</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:00:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:827948</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Some may remember when I asked the question Why doesn't GetDateFormat take a CALID? Some will recall&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=827948" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Nobody likes change</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#667623</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:24:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:667623</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>Picture a Friends episode - the one entitled The One With The Morning After. Chandler, Monica, Joey,...&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=667623" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#543266</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 01:45:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:543266</guid><dc:creator>laura</dc:creator><description>the best school ever&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=543266" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#527240</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 06:08:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:527240</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>Looking at other Win32 API functions, I do not see a strong precedent of the number suffix mechanism (which seems more common in COM-based implementations). There is a wide range of possibilities (including the huge number of weird things that GDI does for the text extent functions), though....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am having trouble seeing what precisely is so bad about the ExEx for tha few functions that already had Ex versions, though. Could you explainI am not sure I see it as particuloar hard to read or as particularly unprofessional.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I mean beyond the reminder of my ex, that is. :-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seriously, could you give me a little more of your thinking on this?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=527240" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#526967</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:30:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:526967</guid><dc:creator>PatriotB</dc:creator><description>:( &amp;nbsp;Just thought I'd offer my two cents on how to make the Windows API set the best it can be.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Plus, anyone using the new functions should be under the understanding that they are &amp;quot;preliminary and subject to change.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;You could even define the ExEx version as a macro for these users.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=526967" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#526273</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:24:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:526273</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>Hi PatriotB,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm sorry to say, but what IE7 here is not really a guideline for the Win32 API (nor is MLang for that matter). But punishing anyone who has started working to use the new functions is not really a good answer either....&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=526273" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#526264</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 06:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:526264</guid><dc:creator>PatriotB</dc:creator><description>Seriously, can you guys PLEASE not use ExEx? &amp;nbsp;It's hard to read, unprofessional, and not scalable at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Plus, it is inconsistent with other APIs. &amp;nbsp;For example, IE 7 is introducing a function CreateURLMonikerEx2 (&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/networking/moniker/reference/functions/createurlmonikerex2.asp?frame=true"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/networking/moniker/reference/functions/createurlmonikerex2.asp?frame=true&lt;/a&gt;). &amp;nbsp;Can you please use Ex2 (EnumCalendarInfoEx2) instead? &amp;nbsp;Please say it isn't too late to make this change. &amp;nbsp;Make it now, before Vista is released, otherwise it will be too late and it will be around forever.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=526264" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New in Vista: What's your name? Who's your daddy?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2006/01/31/520694.aspx#521628</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:16:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:521628</guid><dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator><description>That ExEx thing is horrible, come on you guys can do better than that.  &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=521628" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>