<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Expertise isn't always everything (aka When the one who is learning teaches us something important)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx</link><description>The other day I was chatting by email with a developer on a unique problem -- she was trying to support vertical text. 
 She had seen my blog Let's get vertical , but had not been able to find the TATE sample in the Platform SDK that I mentioned. 
</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Looking at life a bit more vertically, for a moment...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#10066184</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:19:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10066184</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The question Craig asked me last December was clear enough: When will Windows support a vertical layout&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10066184" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>What happens when you involve an unenabled Uniscribe with vertical text, given that Uniscribe doesn't handle vertical text?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#8494848</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:50:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8494848</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So I got email from a developer colleague the other day. It was that same developer who had previously&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8494848" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The forensic typographers found no link to Lucida Console, and the D.A. had nothing to fallback to</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#8325667</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:02:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8325667</guid><dc:creator>Sorting it all Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please read the disclaimer ; content of Michael Kaplan's blog not approved by Microsoft! In particular,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8325667" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Font size scaling -- GDI vs. GDI+</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#7935854</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7935854</guid><dc:creator>Sorting It All Out</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please read the disclaimer ! It is probably a good thing that there are people who feel comfortable turning&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7935854" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Expertise isn't always everything (aka When the one who is learning teaches us something important)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#7496549</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:17:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7496549</guid><dc:creator>Michael S. Kaplan</dc:creator><description>&lt;P&gt;Tested adding it to unrelated fonts that do not claim any vertical support at all? That is a lot less likely. I know they certainly test the EA fonts that are used for vertical....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7496549" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Expertise isn't always everything (aka When the one who is learning teaches us something important)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2008/01/17/7141157.aspx#7492988</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:57:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7492988</guid><dc:creator>jmdesp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a bit puzzled. I never investigated it, but I've seen somewhere a long while ago that the '@' version of those fonts exists to be used for vertical text. So that vertical text starts to work better when you select that version is really, really not surprising for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IMO the japanese teams at Microsoft know about it very well and have tested it fully.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7492988" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>