Visit our webpage
For the past several years, I’ve used Earth Day as an opportunity to look at Microsoft’s progress on environmental sustainability issues over the past 12 months and where we are headed in the year to come.
The most significant progress to report is around Microsoft’s work to achieve carbon neutrality in our current fiscal year. We announced this commitment last year. I’m excited we made the commitment and are on track to meet it, but I am even more excited about how we’re meeting it. We are one of the very first companies to put an internal price on carbon emissions, which provides our business and operational groups more awareness and incentives to conserve energy and seek renewable power. The fee enables us to invest in renewable energy credits and certified offset projects to meet our carbon neutrality goal. I attended the UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen a few years ago where the nations of the world tried and failed to achieve a global system for addressing greenhouse gas emissions. With that in mind, I’m struck that Microsoft is one of very few organizations in the world today imposing a carbon fee across operations in 100+ countries in a way that makes economic and environmental sense.
Since committing to carbon neutrality last year, we here at Microsoft appreciate hearing how others around the world are striving for similar goals of net-zero emissions. This week, Copenhagen announced its plan to be 100 percent carbon neutral by 2025, according to Clean Technica. This would give Denmark’s capital the honor of being the world’s first capital city to achieve carbon neutrality. Read on to learn more about how governments and organizations alike are working toward carbon neutrality.
For the second consecutive year, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has named Microsoft to its Green Power Partnership Top 50 List—and this year our ranking increased to second on the Top 50 List.
One of the biggest contributors to greenhouses gases in the U.S. is what you’d least expect—commercial buildings. In fact, the office you’re reading this blog post in right now may have as much of an environmental impact as your commute to work today. Commercial buildings are responsible for nearly 20 percent of U.S. greenhouse gases—nearly as much as the emissions from all forms of transportation. They are also one of the single greatest operating expenses for companies. Energy plays a significant part in those expenses, particularly when inefficiencies across commercial buildings waste an estimated 15 to 30 percent of the energy they use.
In October 2011, we published a whitepaper that detailed a pilot at Microsoft to make energy-smart buildings. The pilot began with a fairly small number of buildings on our Redmond campus. We took the building management system in some of our buildings and added an additional layer of IT intelligence on top of them. We found that we could reduce energy usage by 6 to 10 percent—all without needing to make a single retrofit to buildings. Today in a story on
“Smart city” has entered the lexicon in the past few years—but what is a smart city? While exact definitions may vary, the overall concept of a smart city lies within its ability to combine sustainability, technology, societal progress and economic prosperity, according to an article published this week in Business Insider. Publications often rank cities both globally and in the U.S. on their ability to adopt smart city practices. But reading about the innovations taking place city-by-city and building-by-building shows how revolutionary smart cities can be. Continue reading to learn more on global efforts to make smart cities the cities of the future.