http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mikefrancis/archive/2009/01/23/top-developer-tips-for-windows-mobile-webcast-follow-up-q-a.aspxHere a list of the questions and answers asked during Wednesday’s Webcast: WILLIAM Asked:: In the real world there seems to be a much larger presence of iPhone and Blackberry touch screen mobile devices than Windows mobile touch screen devices. Whaten-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mikefrancis/archive/2009/01/23/top-developer-tips-for-windows-mobile-webcast-follow-up-q-a.aspx#9378550Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:10:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9378550M Francis<p>Hi Kevin -</p> <p>Thanks for the feedback. You may want to check out the Innovate On program for Windows Mobile. Benefits include free certification testing and code signing. See here: <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.innovateonwindowsmobile.com">http://www.innovateonwindowsmobile.com</a></p> <p>Mike</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9378550" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mikefrancis/archive/2009/01/23/top-developer-tips-for-windows-mobile-webcast-follow-up-q-a.aspx#9373610Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:56:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9373610Kevin Daly<p>The signing requirement is actually a very significant limitation - the fees for certificates are exorbitant.</p> <p>I personally think Apple have handled this quite well - it's included in the annual cost of membership in their programme, which isn't high.</p> <p>It would be beneficial for the Windows Mobile software ecology if Microsoft were to copy that, along with the idea of a centralised App store. But *not* the idiotic ranking system that forces people to price their apps so low they can't make a meaningful profit. This seriously is something you should look at.</p> <p>Pretty please.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9373610" width="1" height="1">