<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Upgrading to SQL Server 2005 and DEFAULT_SCHEMA setting.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssqlisv/archive/2007/03/23/upgrading-to-sql-server-2005-and-default-schema-setting.aspx</link><description>Upgrading to SQL Server 2005 has many benefits . As we look back at the past year and the deployment of SQL Server 2005 with our ISV partners, one important but under-advertised feature in SQL Server 2005 became increasingly visible; the ability to control</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Upgrading to SQL Server 2005 and DEFAULT_SCHEMA setting.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssqlisv/archive/2007/03/23/upgrading-to-sql-server-2005-and-default-schema-setting.aspx#10237666</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:52:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10237666</guid><dc:creator>cfc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;javascript:WebForm_DoPostBackWithOptions(new WebForm_PostBackOptions(&amp;quot;ctl00$content$ctl00$w_52320$_9ef38d$ctl00$ctl00$ctl00$ctl05$bpCommentForm$ctl05$btnSubmit&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;&amp;quot;, true, &amp;quot;BlogPostCommentForm-ctl00_content_ctl00_w_52320__9ef38d_ctl00_ctl00&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;&amp;quot;, false, true))&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10237666" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server Best Practices – Implementation of Database Object Schemas</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssqlisv/archive/2007/03/23/upgrading-to-sql-server-2005-and-default-schema-setting.aspx#9394794</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:33:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9394794</guid><dc:creator>SQL Administration</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;SQL Server Best Practices &amp;amp;ndash; Implementation of Database Object Schemas SQL Server Technical Article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9394794" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Upgrading to SQL Server 2005 - How DEFAULT_SCHEMA helped improve performance for a number of apps.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssqlisv/archive/2007/03/23/upgrading-to-sql-server-2005-and-default-schema-setting.aspx#1994738</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:33:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1994738</guid><dc:creator>TSQLNet Weblog - Cihangir Biyikoglu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is my blog post at the ISV Team blog. DEFAULT_SCHEMA setting helped in a number of cases, especially&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1994738" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>