Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspxHermann Klinke has designed and instrumented an input notation on top of the Microsoft Office math facility that you may want to try. It significantly reduces the number of keystrokes needed to input mathematical text. His motivation is to have a wayen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10580241Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:04:03 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10580241John Dillinger<p>Thanks Matthias,</p>
<p>I've been waiting for this ever since !!</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10580241" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10579370Tue, 09 Dec 2014 12:49:31 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10579370Matthias<p>I uploaded the version 1.3 of Hermann's files:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/z7buz79po4l0113/MSO0127.acl?dl=0">www.dropbox.com/.../MSO0127.acl</a></p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/tdn8fvvss35j35v/eMath%201.3.one?dl=0">www.dropbox.com/.../eMath%201.3.one</a></p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10579370" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10531622Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:48:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10531622John Dillinger<p>I imagined you already used it because of read your descriptive narrative at the beginning of the post. I don't think Hermann will be easy to find ! Anyway, if anything, just post it here. I'll be checking this page intermittently. Thanks.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10531622" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10531611Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:46:43 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10531611MurrayS3<p>I'd be happy to send out Hermann's file, but I don't have one. We need to find Hermann.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10531611" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10531603Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:57:54 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10531603John Dillinger<p>Thanks for the reply, Murray. I asked you because I saw you were active poster and thought you already have a copy of the file Hermann Klinke was sharing. If you have a copy, then I'll be grateful if you can share with me because I'm sure that was Hermann Klinke's wish from the beginning. I was actually referred to this site by Physicforums where Hermann Klinke posted a link to this site. Anyway, if you decide not to, I can still understand. Thanks and take care !</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10531603" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10531590Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:19:22 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10531590MurrayS3<p>The link belongs to Hermann Klinke and unfortunately I've lost his contact info.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10531590" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10531578Thu, 05 Jun 2014 21:37:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10531578John Dillinger<p>MurrayS3, I hope you are reading these posts. Can you do the favor to reupload the files and documentation?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10531578" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10530766Wed, 04 Jun 2014 02:35:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10530766John Dillinger<p>Dear MurrayS3, can you update the links? Drop box gives a 404 error!</p>
<p>Regards </p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10530766" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10530760Wed, 04 Jun 2014 02:06:25 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10530760Chad Winters<p>I started taking notes with one note and I have to say it is some pain to type the symbols. I wanted to create my own autocorrect file but after searching I found this page but the link is dead. Can anyone re-upload. Thanks</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10530760" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10511877Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:35:41 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10511877Kasper<p>Cool, it works! This is sufficient for my needs, but it would be cool if onenote get all the math features that word 2013 has. </p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10511877" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10511606Thu, 27 Mar 2014 22:27:34 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10511606MurrayS3<p>Good point. In fact, you can use U+2061 to insert the function-apply operator. So you could add a math autocorrect entry \re with the Replace string "Re"<space>2061<alt+x>. Then typing \re<space> inserts the function Re with a place holder for the argument. Word doesn't build up the function expression, which may be a bit more convenient in this case since you don't need to move back into the function argument to type z or whatever you want. You can read a bit more about math autocorrect in <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/08/29/sans-serif-mathematical-symbols.aspx">blogs.msdn.com/.../sans-serif-mathematical-symbols.aspx</a>.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10511606" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10511590Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:14:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10511590John<p>What you can do is use math autocorrect to define some "shortcut keys" that replace math text you type with what you want. Look at \binomial for an example. </p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10511590" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10511587Thu, 27 Mar 2014 21:00:31 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10511587MurrayS3<p>Custom functions are only implemented by Word at this point. Thanks for asking; it raises the priority of implementing it for the other apps.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10511587" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10511568Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:37:32 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10511568Kasper<p>Is there any way to define custom functions in onenote. I can do this in word 2013, but not in onenote 2013. </p>
<p>With functions I mean things like sin(x), cos(x) etc. But then customized, so that I can add Re z, en Im z as custom functions. How do I define those custom functions in onenote 2013 ?</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10511568" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10471284Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:09:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10471284meeotch<p>Murray - thanks for the info. Weirdly, my scripts seem to be coming out aligned by default. (This is Onenote 2010.) The right-click context menu "align scripts" option is still there, but it doesn't seem to do anything. I can apply it several times, and the alignment stays the same. (And the option never changes to "un-align" - though maybe it's not supposed to.)</p>
<p>Inserting any of the "invisible" characters seems to give the results that \zwsp does, which is visually correct - though sort of emotionally less satisfying than lenticular brackets. The easiest one seems to be "zero width non-joiner", which klinke has bound to "\".</p>
<p>I'm still unsure how I stumbled onto the lenticular bracket version... I think it's pretty unlikely that I accidentally typed %[x_2%]^3, which is the klinke syntax.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10471284" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10471036Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:38:19 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10471036MurrayS3<p>You can "unstack" the superscript by putting the \begin...\end around the subscripted expression, e.g., \begin a_2\end^3<space>, or you can type a_2<space>\zwsp^3. Note that even the a_2^3 stacked case doesn't align the 3 over the 2 unless you tell it to (OneNote and Word have a context menu option for this). This is because the scripts are kerned relative to the base according to the character corner "cut-in" values.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10471036" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10470887Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:57:31 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10470887meeotch<p>Not sure if Klinke or any other gurus are monitoring this thread, but there's a question that's been driving me crazy: I managed to figure out at one point how to get a superscript not to "stack" on top of a preceding subscript, but I can't seem to remember anymore. So for instance, if you type x_i^2, you get the "squared" exponent directly on top of the "i" subscript. But what I want is the "squared" slightly offset to the right, indicating that the entirety of the x_i element is squared.</p>
<p>Cut-and-pasting from a successful earlier instance gives 〖x_i〗^2 vs. x_i^2 (try it!), with lenticular brackets surrounding the first element. But I'm almost positive that I got there simply through auto-correct, without explicitly typing the brackets. (In fact, it took me like half an hour just to google up what those funny brackets are called.)</p>
<p>p.s. - fantastic package, btw. It makes onenote actually usable for a bunch of the C.S. classes I'm taking.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10470887" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10457029Wed, 16 Oct 2013 05:13:52 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10457029MurrayS3<p>You need to copy your mso0127.acl to your Office folder. On my machine it’s located at</p>
<p>C:\Users\murrays\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Office</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10457029" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10455013Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:16:15 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10455013helloyzz<p>Hi Klinke,</p>
<p>How can I use MSO0127.acl for Office 2013?</p>
<p>Can I have a link for your new version for Office 2013, if available?</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10455013" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10380034Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:50:59 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10380034Hermann Klinke<p>Hello Kasper,</p>
<p>there is no automatic way to do this if this is what you are asking for. But it should be relatively straightforward to create an AutoHotKey file by hand using the "hotstrings" feature of AutoHotKey which replaces the "hotstring" with something else as you type the hotstring. </p>
<p>You can copy the text from the ASCII column in my documentation for the left side of the hotstring and enter the equivalent Tex code on the right side of the hotstring. I recommend downloading the latest version of the documentation and looking it up there because it is much improved over the version that was introduced in the tutorial posted here.</p>
<p>Btw, I new version of the notation for Office 2013 is coming soon.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10380034" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10379483Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:36:52 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10379483Kasper<p>I'm trying to create an autohotkey file that does the same as your autocorrection list.</p>
<p>Not for word 2010, but for Latex/Mathjax typing. Do you know how to be able to quickly convert your correction list to an autohotkey list ?</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10379483" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10350684Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:36:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10350684seanmcd1<p>@WY</p>
<p>are your autohotkey macros that you talk about for working with these autocorrect enhancements online anywhere? i'm curious to see what you've done.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10350684" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10266365Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:47:30 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10266365Hermann Klinke<p>Hello Matthias, sorry for the late reply. I was so busy this week that I didn't get a chance to check my feeds. </p>
<p>Yes, both links always point to the up-to-date documentation and AutoCorrect list, respectively. So the current version that you can download from these links is version 1.3. Let me know if you think that there is something that I could improve. </p>
<p>Btw, a member of the "Digital Musketeers" on Facebook like it so much that he plans on doing a free workshop on my notation in Austria if anyone from Austria wants to learn more about this.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10266365" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10264064Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:04:58 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10264064Matthias B.<p>Thank you Hermann for the great work. Can you please post a link to Version 1.3 or is </p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6237073/MSO0127.acl">dl.dropbox.com/.../MSO0127.acl</a></p>
<p>still the valid adress?</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10264064" width="1" height="1">re: Klinke’s Streamlined Math Input Notationhttp://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2011/11/21/klinke-s-streamlined-math-input-notation.aspx#10263439Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:06 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10263439Hermann Klinke<p>UPDATE: VERSION 1.3 </p>
<p>I am really happy about this version. It fixes all issues and it's much simpler, more consistent and more user friendly. For example, the , (comma) and ' (apostrophe) are no longer AutoCorrected to _ (underscore) and ^ (circumflex), respectively. The # (number sign) is also no longer a modifier. And it is possible to enter the same symbol using several unambiguous sequences where it does not matter what character you started with because you can just build it up on the fly.</p>
<p>Changes in earlier versions were mostly motivated by problems in Office that I tried to work around, which is the reason I had to change it so many times and often times it wasn't as clean as it could have been. I just figured out that Office has problems with ambiguous AutoCorrect entries I so changed my notation in this version so that it now does not have any ambiguous AutoCorrect entries. This made all bugs and issues disappear and as a result the notation is going to be much more stable in the future because I can finally focus on adding more symbols and documentation instead of trying to make it work in all applications of Office. So it now works pretty much the same across Word 2010, OneNote 2010 and PowerPoint 2010. I haven't had a chance to test it in Excel 2010, but I don't expect to have any problems there.</p>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10263439" width="1" height="1">