http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2013/01/29/richedit-8-0-touch-support.aspxWindows 8 introduced substantially better touch facilities than those available in Windows 7. One cool thing is the new touch on-screen keyboard, which is enabled if you have a touch screen. To see it, swipe in from the right side, touch the cog iconenTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2013/01/29/richedit-8-0-touch-support.aspx#10395153Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:06:43 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10395153AntonioFP<p>The inconvenient approach you refer to does autonumbering but I&#39;ve never managed to cross-reference to the equation numbers!</p> <p>The Office equation editor is a superb piece of software but, without a full autonumbering facility, will never be used in serious scientific book edition.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10395153" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2013/01/29/richedit-8-0-touch-support.aspx#10389306Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:44:43 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10389306MurrayS3<p>I totally agree. I keep pushing for it, but program managers claim it isn&#39;t as important as other things. Sigh. OneNote 2013 at least let you put equation numbers on the right hand side. But it&#39;s not autonumbered. In some previous posts I have described macros that let you have autonumbered equations in Word. The approach is a bit inconvenient, but it does work.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10389306" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/murrays/archive/2013/01/29/richedit-8-0-touch-support.aspx#10389305Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:38:47 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10389305Antonio Pestana<p>These are cool and andy facilties no doubt. But what about autonumbering facility for math equations? Sorry to be such a pain ... but I&#39;m tired of waiting &nbsp;for such a basic function!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10389305" width="1" height="1">