Overall v2 app compat testingBetween v2 beta2 (2/3/05) through the final release candidate we tested 291 unique applications. 62 applications were tested against beta2 and 229 different applications were tested against our release candidate. 50 of the top applications were retested during the final test pass against our release candidate build. Each application was run against both Windows Mobile 5 and a device running a variation of Pocket PC 2003. Smartphone applications were only run against devices running Windows Mobile 5. Here is a summary of the results from the application testing between v2 beta2 and the final release candidate:
8 #failures (something doesn't work the same as in v1 SP3)21 #failures found, fixed and verified (ie, not a problem in final v2 release)297 #pass (no differences found when running against v2)326 total number of pass/fail=============================================================98% overall pass rate for applications running against .Net Compact Framework v2
Known issues
Common issues applications might run into:
Bugs postponed to v2 Service Pack 1
Bugs we won't fix
Bugs that are by design
Version Coercions
Version Coercions provide a way to provide backward compatibility for breaking changes. A version coercion is a place in our framework where we execute v1 behavior for applications built with v1, and v2 behavior for applications built with v2. Read more about these in these blog postings:
We've identified a number of potential breaking changes and have implemented Version Coercions for 64 of them. Version Coercions are a big part of our overall 98% pass rate for application compatibility. The Version Coercions were distributed across the following areas:
30 Windows Forms12 Miscellaneous5 Collections5 Execution Engine3 BaseTypes3 XML1 Data1 Drawing1 Globalization1 I/O1 Ldr/Metadata1 Reflection
Our team is working to document the identified breaking changes and will be posting this information to the web at a later date.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights[Author: Michael Lipp]