<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Will Enterprise Architecture Ever “Cross the Chasm?”</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2012/07/26/will-enterprise-architecture-ever-cross-the-chasm.aspx</link><description>The profession of Enterprise Architecture is beginning to emerge from its early stages of development. The number of people professing the title of Enterprise Architect has grown from a relative few in the 1990s to thousands today. On LinkedIn, a popular</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Will Enterprise Architecture Ever “Cross the Chasm?”</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2012/07/26/will-enterprise-architecture-ever-cross-the-chasm.aspx#10340752</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:29:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10340752</guid><dc:creator>Rick S.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the interesting read and a nice tie in to Geoffrey Moore &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.geoffreyamoore.com"&gt;http://www.geoffreyamoore.com&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;Geoffrey is one of my favorite business authors and I&amp;#39;ve been a big fan of his since Crossing the Chasm. &amp;nbsp;I agree that there has not been a direct intention to target a specific market and this can pose a big issue concerning growth. &amp;nbsp;There will always be such bumps in the road concerning company growth however. &amp;nbsp;In Geoffrey&amp;#39;s latest book Escape Velocity &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.escapevelocitybymoore.com"&gt;www.escapevelocitybymoore.com&lt;/a&gt; he looks at companies that are already at the top of their game, but lose a competitive foothold because instead of continuing to innovate, they rest on their past victories. &amp;nbsp;With the changes in the business landscape happening so quickly nowdays, it is dangerous to rest for even a moment. &amp;nbsp;No one wants to be the next Kodak. &amp;nbsp;Thank you again for the good read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10340752" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Will Enterprise Architecture Ever “Cross the Chasm?”</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2012/07/26/will-enterprise-architecture-ever-cross-the-chasm.aspx#10334036</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 05:47:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10334036</guid><dc:creator>Osama S.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nick,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;when you say that EA uses tools and methods designed to produce long-term value. Can you please elaborate, which methods and tools are you referring to? Also what is your definition of longterm?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Osama &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10334036" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>